this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
265 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19107 readers
2678 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

More evidence that Kamala will win comfortably.

all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 34 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Crazy how we already have conspiracy and intent lined up FOR A SECOND FUCKING TIME AND NOTHING BEING DONE.

NOTHING BEING DONE

Nothing we know about. He failed when he ostensibly commanded the apparatus of the federal government. I don't think the odds of him starting an uprising now that his power is diminished, his mind is further molded, and his support is decreasing are very high.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 3 weeks ago
[–] auzy@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

He might be speaking to them but don't forget, he doesn't pay his people.

And, he's literally battling a legal expert for presidency. If he tries that shit again, he's already at a severe disadvantage

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If you ever do legal work for Trump you’re either an idiot or desperate for attention.

[–] Chewget@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

An idiot would be desperate enough for attention to loose their license

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 weeks ago

The unsealed documents make it clear that lawyers by and large were telling him over and over again in 2020 that the election was not stolen. My hope is that lawyers, I'm assuming most of whom have read those documents, tell him to pound sand when he approaches them this time around and as a result the loser just ends up shouting into the wind.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

What is he worried about?

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

Si Vis Pacem...

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl -3 points 3 weeks ago

Considering what happens with Nader, this is just a good idea for all sides