this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
85 points (91.3% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35550 readers
1838 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

They think, "Jesus was cool. I like him, and I'm gonna try to be like him." Kind of like their guiding light is what would Jesus do? But there isn't a focus on identification, recruiting others, judging others based on their religion, fear of God, fear of punishment for sinning, respect for clergy as an authority, rituals, worship, etc. Basically, just the example of Jesus' life.

inb4: Christian lol!! got em!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vxx@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I met a group that called themselves 'Jesus Freaks', but they were just annoying trying to indocrinate people on music festivals.

[–] BackOnMyBS@lemmy.autism.place 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] vxx@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Ha, they weren't a band though, just people that walked the crowd trying to convince people of jesus.

I was a ruthless teenager questioning their beliefs until they got pulled away from me by a higher up.

They somehow couldn't answer why I would need jesus, when I'm already doing all the things they claim they only do because they found jesus.

Today I'm different and don't question people's believes as long as they don't start harming others in the name of their god.

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 4 points 13 hours ago

fan of Jesus?

[–] Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

My Grandmother always called this sort of thing being a "red letter Christian". Basically like you take a highlighter to everything Jesus specifically did or said and discard the rest.

My Mom's family all followed this principle since like the 70's thus saving my trans ass from any hint of intergenerationally inflicted religious trauma so I am a fan. My 92 year old great uncle went to bat to fight for non-binary gender accommodations in his seniors home because one of his nurses is an enby who was getting a raw deal from a number of their paitents. Honestly, though I don't think the Christian God is what he says he is, his kid seems weird but as a rules for life kinda thing the results seem good. .

[–] shasta@lemm.ee 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For context, in some versions of the Bible, the words of Jesus were printed in red font while the rest was black.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 4 points 19 hours ago

Interesting, I thought GamGam was just calling them whores

[–] Skates@feddit.nl 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Jeezie. Like Swiftie, but for fan fiction on the Hebrew Bible.

[–] BackOnMyBS@lemmy.autism.place 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I'm really going to use this. And when there is a dilemma that's easily solved by WWJD, it's gonna be easy Jeezy

[–] vxx@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Jeezy has a bit of a negative stigma since Kanye went full antisemite

[–] Serpent@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

I thought that is kind of what Quakers are?

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago

I'd call you a fan. I'm a fan of Gandalf.

[–] mjhelto@lemm.ee 3 points 19 hours ago

Isn't this just the Golden Rule? I've tried to live like this everyday for 20 years, but it can be difficult in this day and age. Most people don't think like that. It's easy to hold the door for people or say thank you, but it's hard when you don't receive the same courtesy. Jokes on them, though, cause they'll burn in hell!

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 58 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Like uh... normal? Jesus, as described, seems like a pretty chill dude. It's christianity that gets into the crazy shit.

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 day ago (12 children)

I take it you haven't read the book of John?

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah. There's some good stuff there, like 8:32*, but it's full of so much crap** that... urgh.

*"And you'll know the truth, and the truth will set you free."

**Give the whole chapter 5 a check, specially 5:14; crippling people is apparently their god's punishment for sinning. Or 3:36, someone gets really pissy if you don't believe him!

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I was thinking John 6 is pretty nuts tbh. There are a lot of problems with Christ, like how quiet and accepting he seemed about slavery, or how fragile he is about his ego and being respected as God, the central message of Christ is about his divinity, not about moral teachings. He threatened anyone who disagreed with his divinity with eternal damnation and so on. Just not the kind of person you would think of as a "chill dude", rather the description "crazy" comes to mind when I read the book of John especially.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

His moral teachings are irrelevant. It's like how when cops volunteer to do a charity car wash. Moral behaviour doesn't get you everlasting life.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The Gospel of John is the last one written, much later than the others and is full of things that are suspicious. Almost as if it was specifically written to direct a nascent cult into the direction it wanted them to go and not particularly inspired by any actual events.

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 12 hours ago

oh interesting, TIL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_John#Historical_reliability

Thanks! I'll have to read the book of Mark and see how it compares (esp. I wonder if the events depicted in John 6 occur in the book of Mark).

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago

Well, he explicitly condoned slavery, so...

[–] EndOfLine@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

There is a lot of good messaging in the Bible, the Quran, the Torah, etc. You don't need to be religious to appreciate that. Just like how somebody who appreciates in the mission and words of The Amazing Randi does not need a special label.

The labels start to come into play when discussing your belief or disbelief in a god or gods.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Agnostic or spiritual.

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

An enthusiast?

[–] Zikeji@programming.dev 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sounds like you're describing that you view how he is depicted as a good role model. I think the best way to describe it would just be "I'm atheist/agnostic/etc but view Jesus as a good role model" or something to that effect.

Or just lean into chaos and go with "Jesus is my role model" with no elaboration and let people make of it what they will.

Yes! I like this one. Thank you.

[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do you need to be an -ian? Like, if you like the teachings of Ghandi, or Socrates, or Marcus Aurelius, you don't have to call yourself a Ghandian, or a Socratian, or an Aurelian. You just agree with their teachings.

I feel like you're just making a dig on Christians, and it's not like a lot of them don't deserve it, but what you're talking about isn't a religion. You don't need an -ian to like a philosophy.

[–] BackOnMyBS@lemmy.autism.place 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nah, I don't need to identify. That's too restrictive. I'm looking for a shorter way to describe it when asked.

[–] pocker_machine@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If there exits one, most probably next question to you would be “What is that ?” And then you give the long explanation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mjsaber@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I use the term Atheistic Christian, which essentially means I believe in a lot of the teachings of Jesus, but I don't believe he was any kind of divinity.

[–] vzq@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Not to be confused with “secular Christian”, which in popular parlance means “I hang around church for the community but I’m not spiritual”.

[–] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 4 points 1 day ago

The Jesus fandom.

[–] _NetNomad@fedia.io 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_atheism https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesuism

Neither are perfect because Christian Athiests includes people who are "culturally Christian" as that can include clergy as an authority and rituals, and Jesuism would include splinter religious groups and is very easily confused with the Catholic Jesuit order. hopefully it's a starting point though!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LiamMayfair@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 day ago

A Jesuit! Oh wait...

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

What a coincidink, I just commented this on another thread.

The Thomas Jefferson bible might be up your alley. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jefferson_Bible

load more comments (3 replies)

This describes me. I think about this often. The best I’ve come up with is Buddhist. Ultimately isn’t that what Christ taught?

[–] BonerMan@ani.social 4 points 1 day ago (13 children)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›