this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
48 points (76.1% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35764 readers
494 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)

Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.

Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.

Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.

Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.

Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.

Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.

Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.

Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.

Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ja2@lemmy.world
_MoveSwiftly@lemmy.world
Rooki@lemmy.world
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
automodbeta@lemmy.world
L3s@lemmy.world
48
[Meta] Could we consider avoiding US election questions in this community? (sopuli.xyz)
submitted 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) by Blaze@sopuli.xyz to c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.world
20 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Hello everyone,

This community regularly gets questions about the US elections.

This is an important topic, but if there is something that does not lack on Lemmy, it's communities to discuss about politics:

And many others: https://lemmyverse.net/communities?query=politics

I am personally subscribed to this community to learn general things (the question about the viking funeral legal aspect is a good example), and US elections questions seems to always bring more political debate than knowledge sharing.

What do you all think?

See you in the comments.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 25 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't actually see that many political questions in this comm but maybe that's just me. Looking at the top of all time, I mostly notice this one, which honestly is more like a rant than a question (I dislike Trump as much as the next guy but this is clearly not a neutrally stated/good faith question and just a way for the OP to vent their frustration) and should probably be removed on that basis rather than it being a political question.

Honestly looking further, a lot of the political "questions" in this comm are just rants disguised as questions. I think it would make sense to disallow rants. You could say it's already included under the "all posts must be legitimate questions" part of rule 1 but explicitly calling it out and enforcing it would be nice.

[–] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 7 points 4 weeks ago

I made a list below.

I agree with your statement that some of those are definitely rant.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 19 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Has it been much of a problem? I wouldn't say I've personally seen many at all, at least not enough to consider it an issue anyway. Personally I'd be against such a restriction unless it was dominating all discussion on the community and crowding out other discussion.

I think with political literacy generally being pretty low in the majority of people and the impending American election, there will be people that feel like they have "stupid" questions, and they might not feel comfortable asking in one of the more general politics communities. It does no good to keep people in the dark, especially about politics which pretty much affects everything.

Then the mods would have the messy job of determining what constitutes "political" topics, where no one will draw the same lines as another. What is a fact of life for one person might be an incredibly political topic for another.

[–] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

To be fair, I thought there were more, probably because some similar questions are posted to !explainlikeimfive@lemmy.world as well.

what constitutes “political” topics

I was mostly targeting "US elections", I'll rephrase my post to make it more clear.

[–] tobogganablaze@lemmus.org 16 points 4 weeks ago

So 6 examples over 20 days.

I'd say the answer to "Has it been much of a problem?" would be a clear "No" then.

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

I just posted a question about poop, hopefully you find it makes a good palate cleanser.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 weeks ago

I'm kinda torn.

On one hand, I actually fucking despise politics in non politically focused communities. It's a personal peeve.

But. This is one of the types of general communities where it's not disruptive when the questions are in good faith. The reddit sub was prone to bad faith political posts. This one, so far, hasn't been. The ones I've seen have mostly been genuine questions with few attempts to beat a drum. I've even engaged on a few, and I usually avoid politics outside of dedicated spaces.

But damn, I do get tired of the glut of them everywhere as the election gets closer and closer. So if the mods here temporarily banned it, I would not object.

[–] Lemjukes@lemm.ee 11 points 4 weeks ago

Genuine good faith questions about election rules, voting procedures, and candidate policies & positions. Are all things that should be encouraged regardless of country or region.

Bad faith rants or indictments of candidates or parties posing as questions are annoying everywhere.

Discouraging people from seeking information about elections is dangerous and morally dubious at best.

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 8 points 4 weeks ago

I frankly don't think that's a good time to make such a change. People need to be as well-informed as possible, and if allowing questions pertaining to the election brings just one more vote, directly or indirectly, it'll be worth it.

This is a defining election, possibly a matter of life and death for many people.

[–] theskyisfalling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 weeks ago

I agree, Lemmy as a whole is rammed full of bullshit US politics and I'm tired of reading about it. The fewer, relevant communities this shit gets posted to, the better IMO.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 weeks ago

IIRC most of those communities are for political news and NOT discussion.

[–] vxx@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago

It's less than 3 weeks to go.

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 5 points 4 weeks ago

OneStupidQuestion

[–] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 3 points 4 weeks ago

Yea good luck with that one lol

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

Agree

[–] Artisian@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

As one of the few folks who have asked such questions, I obviously am against. I don't think the dedicated pol communities are particularly good for honest questions about platforms/political figures; everything in those spaces feels like it's being intentionally spun (even in discussions) in a way that this community does not. (Also, several of the communities you suggest as pol discussion places are... just not? Extremely few questions, most the posts are headlines, discussions don't seem to happen much. Some feel closer to a curated feed of cringe.)

I do agree it could become an issue, and that would justify some division, perhaps tags? But I don't think it is currently very unpleasant, and it will almost certainly get better in 2 months (at least short term).