this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
212 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19170 readers
4550 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] themadcodger@kbin.earth 83 points 1 month ago (4 children)

The Fraternal Order of Police convention in the battleground state of North Carolina was billed as a way for Trump to pitch himself as a law-and-order figure and cast his Democratic opponent, Vice President Kamala Harris, a former prosecutor and California attorney general, as weak.

It's amazing to me that we live in reality where a certain population believes that a convicted felon would be seen as a "law and order" president, but the prosecutor and AG would not.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Do you think cops like prosecutors or AGs?

Cops want to be the end all and be all of the justice system, it's not even unheard of for them to stop doing their jobs to protest the DA/AG/prosecutor who tries to hold a cop accountable or not do something they want.

They'll still arrest and hassle people, even lock them up. But when it goes to trial, they don't. And in our justice system often the only proof of a crime is what a cop says. So if they don't show the case is lost and that hurts the careers of DAs, AGs, and prosecutors.

They 100% identify with a corrupt politicians more than a prosecutor.

[–] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Because to them, he never did anything wrong. He was always innocent and is being unjustly persecuted.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

It's all cope, no hope

[–] Hikermick@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

They love the feeling of smoke being blown up their ass. How else do you explain them endorsing candidates that consistently vote to make it easier for criminals to get their hands on military grade weapons?

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 75 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Largest police union endorsing a convicted felon. Upside down world.

[–] gdog05@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The police just see themselves not as exploited protectors of capital but rather temporarily embarrassed felons.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 48 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Daily reminder that police aren't workers and the police association is not a union

[–] sensiblepuffin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Agreed on the first part, but I'm not sure I agree on the second - the FOP is the best union in the country in terms of protecting its members.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Their point is that a union is for workers alone. If you’re not a worker, it can’t be a union. I don’t know what they want it to be called though.

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Plus unions don't union bust other unions

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 month ago
[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Organize Criminal Syndicate Endorse Fellow Racist Trump

Ftfy

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago

Police Officers endorse Convicted Felons because Police Officers UPHOLD THE LAW!

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -4 points 2 months ago

Associated Press - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Associated Press:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://apnews.com/article/trump-police-crime-law-enforcement-de5662eb889fb5dd75a893e1871b3400
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support