this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2024
7 points (64.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54565 readers
426 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 months ago

MKV is just the container though, what really matter are the codecs and their parameters. Transforming the container (aka remuxing) doesn't require a lot of processing power, and in fact some platforms like Plex will remux an MKV to another format on-the-fly to another container if the player doesn't natively support MKV but otherwise support the codecs used inside with little effort required.

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Usenet.

EDIT: I still don't understand the general dislike towards Usenet in this community. Once I took the plunge, I honestly couldn't dream of going back to torrents again. It's just so damn convenient and reliable.

[–] chahk@beehaw.org 9 points 2 months ago

Not to mention fast.

[–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think it's a bit unfair too, buddy. Usenet with the *arr stack and Jellyfin is such a great experience with all that automation, once you've got it all setup. Mine's setup to preference H265 and 5.1 channel audio, and specific resolution/quality. I mean, yeah you can access much the same content completely for free using torrents instead, but it feels like going back to the steam age now to do it all manually.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You can automate the same way with torrents, can’t you? I mean, you can even use indexers of both types at the same time.

[–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, you can integrate torrents into the stack, afaik. But due to some technical considerations I don't like to run a VPN on my media server, and in my country you definitely need one for torrents.

[–] Grippler@feddit.dk 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

due to some technical considerations I don't like to run a VPN on my media server

What's the reasons against using a VPN here?

[–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Getting into the weeds a bit here lol. I do use a VPN on my personal PC, but on the media server where I have my *arr stack, I've found that using a VPN, even with split tunneling configured, allows certain TV websites to detect I'm using a VPN and block streaming content. If I wasn't using a DNS proxy, or if I ran the stack on a separate server, it probably wouldn't be an issue, but I'm not so it is :p. I'll add that if I am using only Usenet then I prefer not to run a VPN since it's reasonably safe IMO to raw dog that content, since a VPN always has some overhead involved in terms of bandwidth and latency.

[–] Grippler@feddit.dk 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Why not just run the torrenting stack behind the VPN in a separate docker container? Then the rest of your media server is completely unaffected by the VPN and no need for any split tunneling.

[–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's a good suggestion, I just haven't had the motivation to get that setup yet since Usenet currently meets my needs. But I'm sure it would work, yes.

[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 months ago

Gluetun works great for this. It's a VPN docker container that you can route other containers' network connections through. Super lightweight and fast

[–] HumanPerson@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

Idk if you tried this, but I run all my stuff on docker and put specific things through gluetun (arrs and qbit).

[–] matey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago

Once I got into decent private trackers, I stopped paying for Usenet. That said, it was great for when I was starting out.

[–] Joejoe582@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The question should be: "Where NOT to find movies to download in high quality in .mkv file format?"

[–] True@lemy.lol 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] kaboom36@ani.social 11 points 2 months ago

You will have an easier time finding quality media in .mkv than not, its one of, if not the most popular formats out there

[–] tilefan@lemm.ee 13 points 2 months ago

various torrent sites.

[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You can download in whatever format is available for any given movie. Often movies are available in multiple formats, especially the popular ones. DM your email address amd I can invite you to a private tracker but only if you promise to keep a good ratio.

Also I'm sure some other commenter is literally going to say "mkv is a container not a format" but whatever, if you want mkvs the movie or show you want has to have an mkv available.

[–] minibyte@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Look for “remux” – that’s the file direct from Bluray. If you need an invite to torrentleech DM me an email address to send it to.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago

Private trackers

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago

Why mkv? Use a torrent site (with ublock, etc) or bring up a streaming site and use yt-dlp

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 months ago

Thats... like the right place