this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2024
7 points (64.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

53939 readers
206 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 weeks ago

MKV is just the container though, what really matter are the codecs and their parameters. Transforming the container (aka remuxing) doesn't require a lot of processing power, and in fact some platforms like Plex will remux an MKV to another format on-the-fly to another container if the player doesn't natively support MKV but otherwise support the codecs used inside with little effort required.

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Usenet.

EDIT: I still don't understand the general dislike towards Usenet in this community. Once I took the plunge, I honestly couldn't dream of going back to torrents again. It's just so damn convenient and reliable.

[–] chahk@beehaw.org 9 points 2 weeks ago

Not to mention fast.

[–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think it's a bit unfair too, buddy. Usenet with the *arr stack and Jellyfin is such a great experience with all that automation, once you've got it all setup. Mine's setup to preference H265 and 5.1 channel audio, and specific resolution/quality. I mean, yeah you can access much the same content completely for free using torrents instead, but it feels like going back to the steam age now to do it all manually.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You can automate the same way with torrents, can’t you? I mean, you can even use indexers of both types at the same time.

[–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, you can integrate torrents into the stack, afaik. But due to some technical considerations I don't like to run a VPN on my media server, and in my country you definitely need one for torrents.

[–] Grippler@feddit.dk 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

due to some technical considerations I don't like to run a VPN on my media server

What's the reasons against using a VPN here?

[–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Getting into the weeds a bit here lol. I do use a VPN on my personal PC, but on the media server where I have my *arr stack, I've found that using a VPN, even with split tunneling configured, allows certain TV websites to detect I'm using a VPN and block streaming content. If I wasn't using a DNS proxy, or if I ran the stack on a separate server, it probably wouldn't be an issue, but I'm not so it is :p. I'll add that if I am using only Usenet then I prefer not to run a VPN since it's reasonably safe IMO to raw dog that content, since a VPN always has some overhead involved in terms of bandwidth and latency.

[–] Grippler@feddit.dk 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Why not just run the torrenting stack behind the VPN in a separate docker container? Then the rest of your media server is completely unaffected by the VPN and no need for any split tunneling.

[–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's a good suggestion, I just haven't had the motivation to get that setup yet since Usenet currently meets my needs. But I'm sure it would work, yes.

[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 weeks ago

Gluetun works great for this. It's a VPN docker container that you can route other containers' network connections through. Super lightweight and fast

[–] HumanPerson@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

Idk if you tried this, but I run all my stuff on docker and put specific things through gluetun (arrs and qbit).

[–] matey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 weeks ago

Once I got into decent private trackers, I stopped paying for Usenet. That said, it was great for when I was starting out.

[–] Joejoe582@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The question should be: "Where NOT to find movies to download in high quality in .mkv file format?"

[–] True@lemy.lol 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] kaboom36@ani.social 11 points 2 weeks ago

You will have an easier time finding quality media in .mkv than not, its one of, if not the most popular formats out there

[–] tilefan@lemm.ee 13 points 2 weeks ago

various torrent sites.

[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You can download in whatever format is available for any given movie. Often movies are available in multiple formats, especially the popular ones. DM your email address amd I can invite you to a private tracker but only if you promise to keep a good ratio.

Also I'm sure some other commenter is literally going to say "mkv is a container not a format" but whatever, if you want mkvs the movie or show you want has to have an mkv available.

[–] minibyte@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Look for “remux” – that’s the file direct from Bluray. If you need an invite to torrentleech DM me an email address to send it to.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago

Private trackers

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago

Why mkv? Use a torrent site (with ublock, etc) or bring up a streaming site and use yt-dlp

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago

Thats... like the right place