this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2024
7 points (64.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54565 readers
426 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Usenet.

EDIT: I still don't understand the general dislike towards Usenet in this community. Once I took the plunge, I honestly couldn't dream of going back to torrents again. It's just so damn convenient and reliable.

[–] chahk@beehaw.org 9 points 2 months ago

Not to mention fast.

[–] matey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago

Once I got into decent private trackers, I stopped paying for Usenet. That said, it was great for when I was starting out.

[–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think it's a bit unfair too, buddy. Usenet with the *arr stack and Jellyfin is such a great experience with all that automation, once you've got it all setup. Mine's setup to preference H265 and 5.1 channel audio, and specific resolution/quality. I mean, yeah you can access much the same content completely for free using torrents instead, but it feels like going back to the steam age now to do it all manually.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You can automate the same way with torrents, can’t you? I mean, you can even use indexers of both types at the same time.

[–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, you can integrate torrents into the stack, afaik. But due to some technical considerations I don't like to run a VPN on my media server, and in my country you definitely need one for torrents.

[–] Grippler@feddit.dk 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

due to some technical considerations I don't like to run a VPN on my media server

What's the reasons against using a VPN here?

[–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Getting into the weeds a bit here lol. I do use a VPN on my personal PC, but on the media server where I have my *arr stack, I've found that using a VPN, even with split tunneling configured, allows certain TV websites to detect I'm using a VPN and block streaming content. If I wasn't using a DNS proxy, or if I ran the stack on a separate server, it probably wouldn't be an issue, but I'm not so it is :p. I'll add that if I am using only Usenet then I prefer not to run a VPN since it's reasonably safe IMO to raw dog that content, since a VPN always has some overhead involved in terms of bandwidth and latency.

[–] Grippler@feddit.dk 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Why not just run the torrenting stack behind the VPN in a separate docker container? Then the rest of your media server is completely unaffected by the VPN and no need for any split tunneling.

[–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's a good suggestion, I just haven't had the motivation to get that setup yet since Usenet currently meets my needs. But I'm sure it would work, yes.

[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 months ago

Gluetun works great for this. It's a VPN docker container that you can route other containers' network connections through. Super lightweight and fast

[–] HumanPerson@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

Idk if you tried this, but I run all my stuff on docker and put specific things through gluetun (arrs and qbit).