this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
610 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3194 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

George W. Bush, the infamously anti-gay and neoconservative former U.S. president who invaded Iraq on a lie, has criticized congressional Republicans for threatening to defund the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), a largely successful African HIV-prevention program that he launched back in 2003. “There is no program more pro-life” than PEPFAR, he wrote.

Though PEPFAR is estimated to have saved over 25 million lives, its funding is set to expire on September 30. Congressional Republicans are falsely claiming that the program promotes abortion and using its re-funding as a bargaining chip in budget negotiations. Republicans have threatened to defund the entire federal government at the end of the month unless they’re allowed to slash military diversity programs and military aid to Ukraine and to increase anti-immigration measures at the U.S.-Mexico border.

“We are on the verge of ending the HIV/AIDS epidemic. To abandon our commitment now would forfeit two decades of unimaginable progress and raise further questions about the worth of America’s word,” Bush wrote in an a Wednesday opinion article in The Washington Post.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 227 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

How dare modern republicans put me in even a situation where I have to agree with GW Bush.

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

What is reality

[–] pimento64@sopuli.xyz 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Things I agree with George W. Bush on:

  1. Stay out of a brawl if Bo Jackson is on the other side
  2. This
[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He shouldn't get credit for 1, that's just common sense. Bo knows

I did however also agree with him about Trumps inauguration being some "weird shit"

[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 138 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“Real pro-life republicans” are now calling for death penalty for women. There was nothing pro-life about republicans. Ever.

[–] kiranraine@reddthat.com 36 points 1 year ago

Bc it's always been probirth or pro forced birth. They're infamous for naming things against what they actually do. But people vote and empower them all the same bc they fall for it

[–] Chozo@kbin.social 110 points 1 year ago

The world is in a sad state when George W Bush is the voice of reason for the GOP.

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 63 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They’re pro-birth. “Pro-life” is just marketing.

[–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They aren't pro-birth. If they were pro-birth they would be for universal healthcare coverage of birth expenses.

They are pro-controlling women's bodies.

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Universal healthcare would also give women access to birth control.

They want women to have babies for some combination of a various number of reasons. There are some who view it as a means of breeding a cheap compliant labor force, some who think it’ll reinforce a more traditional family role on them and diminish their influence on society, and those who see it as a way to punish women for sleeping around. It’s about more than just their bodies, it’s about controlling society and women's place in it.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I think it's about causing poverty and an endless supply of hopeless, low-wage workers.

[–] BorgDrone@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago

These people aren’t pro anything specific, they just get off on causing as much suffering as possible. They are pure evil.

[–] pachrist@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd say they're more anti-sex, but also not really, because most conservatives I've talked to on the subject just pretend it doesn't exist.

They just kind of bury their head in the sand. There's no way their daughter might have sex on Prom night. Don't talk about it, it might put ideas in her head. There's no way my son and his girlfriend would have sex; they're Christians. Talking about contraceptives will just pervert their young, pure minds.

It's not about controlling women's bodies, it's about ignoring women's bodies. Banning abortion or eliminating sex education just helps to ensure that no conversations happen.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] joneskind@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How fucking crazy times I must live in if my French leftist ass is now cheering the once most hated man in the World’s common sense.

Gotta deep fry some freedom potatoes I guess.

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I find it depressing that common sense is so uncommon that this broken clock scenerio is grounds for praise... we will meet you half way on the taters with poutine.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 45 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I’ve never actually met a Republican who was FOR life. They’re just FOR control.

[–] Ragdoll_X@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

100%. There are plenty of studies showing that supposed "pro-life" sentiment explains little of the left-right difference in abortion support.

A 2014 study analyzed the data of more than 7400 people and found that “perceptions of preborn humanness explained very little of right–left differences in abortion support, and the association between preborn humanness perceptions and abortion opposition was no stronger for those on the political right (vs. left).”4 And a 2022 poll by Pew also found that a third of Americans simultaneously believe that a fetus is a person with rights and that the decision to abort should be up to the woman. This means that the majority of people who believe that life starts at conception (about 59%) still believe that women should have the right to an abortion.10

By contrast, a 2017 study found that sexism accounted for 30% to 70% of the left-right difference in abortion stance even after controlling for other relevant variables.5 An earlier study found that authoritarianism had a significant correlation with an anti-abortion position and aggression towards women,6 and a 2019 study found that right-wing authoritarianism had a significant correlation with anti-abortion stigma both before and after controlling for other variables.7

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 4 points 1 year ago

The core value is "There are out-groups the law must bind but not protect, and in-groups the law must bind but not protect." Hence the republicans who get abortions for themselves and close ones, but don't want it for anyone else.

You can also describe it as "No one tells me what to do. I tell other people what to do."

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Haha. He’s a born Republican. Or a hexbear, I can’t tell.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] keeb420@kbin.social 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hey dumbass they ain't prolife they're procontrol of women's body and reproduction.

[–] pthaloblue@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago

aaand racist. They don't want money going to help Africa. At all.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 37 points 1 year ago

PEPFAR has been surprisingly successful and has been more successful now that it is no longer linked to pushing Christian values. Republicans can't have that though.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 year ago

Like it or not, he's right.

But...

Republican politicians don't give a shit about life. They give about their base and their base wants people to convert and become good Christ followers. Having sex for fun isn't part of that, so they can die and burn in hell, fuck those people.

[–] AndreaHill@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (3 children)

“Bush has gone woke and is a commie radical librul just like the pope. Guns and jeezus fuck yea!! Murica fuck yea!!” - someone you know

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.one 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"No wait, Jesus is too woke now." -- actual right wing psychos

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Republican Jesus 2 trailer tagline “When Jesus comes back, he won’t be woke, he’s gonna be pissed.”

[–] AquaTofana@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Excuse me, that someone is my father you're speaking about!

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

That someone for me is my uncle.

I sent him a custom mug with trump’s mugshot and listing all the indictments under “Donald J Trump; the most felonious president”.

He’d be pissed if he could read.

[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I like to think that this is just him realizing something that happened under his administration.

Dick Cheney: " Let's defund HIV programs."

Bush:" OK. "

22 years later

Bush: " Wait a second... that isn't Christian!"

Laura: "Dear, you haven't been president for 15 years."

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

Someone who is really "pro-life" also probably wouldn't have started a war that killed 400,000 civilians either.

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

The shitshow we’re dealing with today makes me miss that idiot.

[–] macaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago

throws shoe at George Bush

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

They most certainly would knowing them.

load more comments
view more: next ›