this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
196 points (100.0% liked)

News

23367 readers
3285 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The U.S. Postal Service on Thursday said it needs to shave more costs from its operations to get into better financial shape. To do that, the postal agency wants to overhaul its delivery logistics, resulting in some customers likely seeing a slowdown in their mail delivery.

top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 176 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children)

The 👏 USPS 👏 is 👏 a 👏 government 👏 service and does not need to be "profitable". You don't hear people complaining that the military "loses" $700B a year.*

I know DeJoy can't just be fired, but I really wish there were some progress toward ousting him.

* Aside from the valid complaints about military spending in general. Also the $700B figure is likely out of date.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 40 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

A great deal of the financial pressure that the USPS has been under resulted from the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act [which] required the Postal Service to create a $72 billion fund that would pay for its employees’ retirement health benefits for more than 50 years into the future

The system is absurd and intentionally so. The goal of this system is to starve the USPS of spendable cash in a quixotic effort to save money for employees who haven't been born yet.

I know DeJoy can’t just be fired

Biden has the power to fire and replace the entire USPS Board of Governors. The replacements then have the power to replace DeJoy.

But in much the same way Biden refuses to pack the SCOTUS (a nine seat bench that presides over thirteen appellate courts and should have been expanded decades ago), he's dragging his heels on a Board of Governors long ago stacked with Republican nominees. This is because Biden fucking voted for this policy. One of the worst bills in US History was passed through the Senate with unanimous consent.

[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Decorum strikes again!

(Am I ever tired of the government being run by people who do what they do because that's the way they've always done it. No more greatests/silents/boomers who have been in government for 20, 30, 40, 50 years please.)

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

"Decorum," or just Democrats not actually being the allies to normal people that people want them to be.

(To be clear: that's still way better than the Republicans' outright mustache-twirling villainy.)

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Lol, yeah. $700B was just the last figure I recalled clearly but was pretty sure it had increased.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago

It always increases, sigh...

[–] Sumocat@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The key difference is the USPS is self-funded, so it does need to cover costs and maintain a reserve to cover downturns, which it could do by expanding into basic banking services, like check cashing, if DeJoy was not tasked with grinding the service down.

[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Tasked? DeJoy owns a freight company, breaking and outsourcing USPS is in his financial interest

[–] LemmyFeed@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Ugh does he really?

[–] Sumocat@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He didn’t appoint himself to the job.

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 2 points 3 months ago

No he was just appointed by a fascist to dismantle the USPS to try and block mail in votes

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

so it does need to cover costs

What about that determination isn't 100% arbitrary?

[–] Sumocat@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago

Do you think postal carriers work for free? Salaries, vehicle maintenance, keeping the lights on, etc, these are all real expenses.

[–] ravhall@discuss.online 13 points 3 months ago

700 billion is just the figure that we get to know about

Maybe if they would take that 700 billion and invest it in an interest-bearing way, They would be able to pay for them selves.

[–] mystik@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

The hold up is that the new appointees Biden picked also support DeJoy, because Biden doesn't actually oppose DeJoy's destruction of USPS.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 39 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

As a cancer patient, I have to say: This is fucked.

I'm not an old person yet, but I already have one old person issue: I have a specialized drug that I need to stay alive, that is also only available via mailorder.

Tons of elderly have a fuckton of medications just like that. All of them only available from specialized pharmacies that only are available by mail order.

This will kill people waiting to get life saving medications. That is all.

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

And also because of the ridiculousness of controlled substances, you can't just order ahead for, say, 2 months of buffer that could negate the risk of delays.

Because people can't be trusted with too much medicine. Like everyone's going to OD on cancer drugs or something if they don't ration it out to the day.

[–] kurwa@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I have this problem. My doctor tried to get me 2 months of my medication and the pharmacist said, "yOuR iNsUrAnCe DoEsN't clCoVeR tHaT." Ain't painkillers or anything, literally my drug to keep me alive. If I wanted to OD theres a lot of easier drugs you could get without a pharmacist.

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I have 3.5 cats on the same medication (0.5 cat is shared custody we watch sometimes). Juggling 4 prescriptions is a pain in the ass. Life would be much simpler if we could just get a Costco sized bottle of it and be good for half a year or more. For a medication that is very commonly prescribed for elderly cats.

[–] kurwa@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I wholeheartedly agree. We could get prescribed years of medication, because the expiration date on medication isn't even true.

[–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 6 points 3 months ago

Also, insurance doesn't care if you are almost out and it will take three weeks to get there. Sorry, we can't authorize payment for another ten days!

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I'd never want to have life-saving meds sent through the USPS.

You can get specialized services for shipping pharmaceuticals to your pharmacy, like what FedEx offers..

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

The pharmacy in question is CVS Specialty, and they already offer shipping direct to a local pharmacy.

That doesn't really change the calculus that if it is sent via USPS, and USPS has slowdowns, that it may take dangerously too long to arrive.

They don't really let you choose what partner they're going to ship with, so it's a "you get what you get" situation and I can't ask for FedEx specifically if I wanted it. They ship with whatever's cheapest to them at a given time.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

That's a real shame, really.

Perhaps this threat of mail slowdown will prompt CVS to use other providers. I can't imagine they'll want to jeopardize their customer's health and safety by using an unreliable and slow method of shipping critical medication.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Resorting to a private service because USPS is prevented from doing its job is exactly what the saboteurs want.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Saboteurs, IE Republicans.

[–] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's election time. Better slow the mail down to stop THOSE people from defrauding our democracy! /s

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I like the joke, but that was the first thing I looked for in the article. At least they’re not doing that this time

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Why wasn’t DeJoy arrested for last time.

Unfuckingbelievable that shit stain still has that job.

[–] tomkatt@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

USPS does not need to make a profit, this is just bonkers. I live in a rural area and don’t even get mail delivery, and for a time we didn’t even have a local post office. Here’s hoping that doesn’t happen again.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

They shouldn't be required to profit, or break even, but they pretty much are.

We're self-funding. The Postal Service generally receives no tax dollars for operating expenses and relies on the sale of postage, products and services to fund its operations.

OTOH, not seeing how that prevents government funding:

The statute that created the Postal Service begins with the following sentence: “The United States Postal Service shall be operated as a basic and fundamental service provided to the people by the Government of the United States, authorized by the Constitution, created by an Act of Congress, and supported by the people.” 39 U.S.C. §101(a).

https://facts.usps.com/top-facts/

[–] sumguyonline@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

If DeJoy could just get fired, and Congress could undo the asinine retirement fund the postal service is forced to fund that pays for retirement of people the post office will hire in the future. This wouldn't be happening. They could expand service. That's right! Georgie bush Jr and the republicans forced the USPS to pay retirement so far ahead it covers people not old enough to work there yet. Prior to that the post office had money left over and they had a good retirement plan. Plus FedEx an ups said they ain't gonna fill in for the post office, they are not capable with their infrastructure for the prices charged. Postal service is required and a good service when it's being run properly, and not being forced to look incompetent by two faced politicians claiming to be business savy.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Why is DeJoy still in charge of USPS?

[–] grue@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Because Biden wants him to be. Biden has made enough appointments to the USPS Board of Governors that they would have a majority to remove DeJoy if they wanted, but Biden appointed DeJoy supporters instead.

Edit: if you downvoters think I'm wrong, reply with an alternative explanation.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I actually agree with you. Though I don’t know why Biden has left him in place. DeJoy sucks, and I hope the next Democratic president pushes to remove him.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago
[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago

CBS News - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for CBS News:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.cbsnews.com/news/usps-mail-slowdown-postmaster-louis-dejoy/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

[–] FlavoredButtHair@lemmy.world -3 points 3 months ago

Bills are almost paperless. They are he only thing we need USPS for is packages, that's it. Some people get their meds and such through USPS.