this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
628 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2258 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

As the vice president introduced her new running mate at an energetic rally in Philadelphia, he quickly demonstrated his ability to deliver searing attacks against Donald Trump and JD Vance.

America’s introduction to Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota began with a half-hour of cheering for Vice President Kamala Harris and ended with some of the sharpest attacks Democrats have leveled against former President Donald J. Trump and his running mate, Senator JD Vance of Ohio.

Before a raucous crowd in Philadelphia, Ms. Harris and Mr. Walz presented the Minnesotan as a folksy former schoolteacher and football coach who had inspired his students, served in the military and improved his constituents’ lives.

But it was his ability to deliver searing yet accessible attacks against their Republican opponents that won Mr. Walz a place on the national ticket, and during his first rally, he did not miss his marks.

“Donald Trump sees the world a little differently than us,” he said. “First of all, he doesn’t know the first thing about service. He doesn’t have time for it because he’s too busy serving himself.”

Then came the dagger. “Violent crime was up under Donald Trump,” he said, before pausing for effect. “That’s not even counting the crimes he committed.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] snooggums@midwest.social 182 points 3 months ago (3 children)

About time the Dems had some charismatic candidates who are willing to push back against the bullying of Republicans instead of taking the high road.

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 44 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Thank God. Finally sounds like they believe in themselves which gives other people a reason to believe in them. Finally fighting.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 26 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I think a lot of things started to go wrong right after Hilary said "When they go low, we go high".

Back then they were labouring under the assumption that the Republican Party (and voters) actually had a sense of shame; that if you stick to the "political" fights rather than throwing some shade, you'll eventually come out on top.

Now they (finally) know better. You gotta throw some shade in with that policy, and if you can make the shade humorous, all the better. Because the only thing Trump cares about is being seen as 'strong', and that's why this whole 'weird' thing is working as well as it has.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 14 points 3 months ago

It was Michelle Obama who coined that, but you're right otherwise.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Now they (finally) know better.

I kind of doubt Clinton and Biden approve of this shift and still think taking the high road is the right way. Biden is still taking the high road!

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 months ago

And that's why they lost; and would have lost again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ExtravagantEnzyme@lemm.ee 15 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Basically couldn't have come any later really. They're already coming out the gates scrabbling with just 3 months and change until voting starts.

[–] Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 94 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Only having them campaign for a few months is refreshing. I'd love to see it happen more often.

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Plus it minimized fascist election fuckery...it's not zero and we need people watching electors that think they can lie... Trying to subvert the will of the voters should be considered treason and treated as such legally.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

America is one of the only countries with such a long election cycle. Up here in Canada it's much shorter thankfully. Get it over with and let people get on with their lives.

[–] niucllos@lemm.ee 51 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not that I ascribe this to strategy, but I wonder if this will work in their favor. The last minute change of jockey has been dominating the news since it happened, and pushing Trump's ridiculous things to the side. This ticket will have huge and new name recognition in voters' minds, and a lot less time to get mud to stick

[–] modifier@lemmy.ca 44 points 3 months ago

I think it will definitely work in their favor, and I hope it kicks off a trend towards a shorter election season, but the corporate media will resist that.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 139 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Wow, no wonder republicans are pissed off.

They have old man tiny hands and the couchfucker to try to counter these guys.

[–] finley@lemm.ee 46 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Kamala + Walz? The GOP is screwed.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 59 points 3 months ago

if normal people vote.

[–] modifier@lemmy.ca 114 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I can't stop thinking about how ingenius the couch joke is. The reference is obvious if you know the meme but oblique enough to maintain plausible deniability, but it doesn't matter because guess what, Republicans can't even complain about this without giving further airtime to the ridiculous meme itself. It is a serrated takedown.

[–] Enfors@lemm.ee 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm out of the loop on that one. Can you explain it to those of us who missed it, please?

[–] vxx@lemmy.world 55 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

The Internet is memeing about Vance being a couch fucker. He tried to refute it by saying he never had sex with a couch to completion, which obviously was a self own.

Walz said yesterday that he's happy to debate Vance, if Vance can get his ass off the couch.

[–] Argurotoxus@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Just so you're aware that refutation was also spoofed.

Whole situation remains funny af though. And Walz is adept at twisting the knife.

[–] vxx@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago (9 children)

Man, it's tough to tell what is real these days.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Enfors@lemm.ee 25 points 3 months ago (2 children)

he never had sex with a couch to completion

Uhmmm... what? Why would he say that? Was there actually some truth to the claim that he had sex with a couch, or what?

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

None. He just did a really bad job refuting it. Honestly, it's such a goofy meme that most adults would just ignore it, but these are Republicans we're talking about. It's incredibly easy to distract them with frivolous stuff.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Even better, there was some website explaining and refuting it all, but then it was taken down lol.

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 26 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Even better it was the bastion of objective Journalism the Associated Press (AP). They took it down because they can't prove he didn't fuck a couch.

Edit - I love this because it's the same as the old "Did Glenn Beck rape and murder a girl in 1990?". He's never come out to say he didn't.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

That's because Beck, while being a faux emotional cryptofascist shit bird, wasn't a fucking moron and knew that the only way to stop someone JAQing off is to ignore them. Only partially because JAQing off was his primary MO.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Yeah, they couldn't prove that Vance never fucked a couch, just that he didn't say he did in a book. But no one was quoting the book anyways, not after the meme started.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 41 points 3 months ago (1 children)

i wonder if he has a license to throw those haymakers.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

He does. It's a license to thrill.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 40 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I was gonna say I wish she'd chosen someone younger since she herself is much younger than Trump or Biden and that's a decent selling point in the current state of affairs

And then I looked it up and he's only a year older than her. The passage of time really hasn't affected them equally.

[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 63 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He was also a school teacher for 20 years, so that's aged him 10 years more, at least.

[–] triptrapper@lemmy.world 31 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He said something like, "You don't supervise the lunch room for 19 years and come out with a full head of hair."

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This is hilarious and very similar to a joke my wife (a high-school teacher) made. It’s got to be a common takeaway for people who know.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 33 points 3 months ago

Walz became the nation's Dad as he entered the national political stage. When I think of all the lions that came from that part of the country, he is definitely on the list.

[–] Mountain_Mike_420@lemmy.ml 25 points 3 months ago

Super stoked, and everything I am reading and seeing of him only makes me more excited.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago (4 children)

It's a shame he's a teetotaler now, he has the highest "I could have a beer with him" score of any candidate I've ever seen.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 42 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He can just be the "I could have a root beer with him" candidate then.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 18 points 3 months ago

Yeah. Actually he seems like he'd be totally okay with you having a beer

[–] ech@lemm.ee 27 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Learn to hang out with people without alcohol involved instead of treating their choice to not drink as a problem.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

It was a reference to the type of appeal that the media made a big deal about George W. Bush having. Learn to let a joke go by without seizing the opportunity to talk down to someone.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago (11 children)

I'd have a nonalcoholic beer with him any time!

They actually make a lot of REALLY tasty ones now, which makes my life as a beer-loving ex-drinker a LOT easier when there's a football game on, for example 😁

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Rakonat@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'd have rated Al Franken higher but he's pretty much left politics for good at this point.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 months ago

He runs a weekly political podcast at least

load more comments
view more: next ›