this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
684 points (97.6% liked)

politics

19136 readers
3624 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 205 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

A lot of conservatives think trrmp is a traitor, too.

I mean, they should. The evidence provides.

But they usually think he betrayed the extremes of their bigotries rather than the country and general decency.

[–] Audacious@sh.itjust.works 26 points 3 months ago (7 children)

That's good news for the coming election. But I still fear he won't ever be punished for his numerous crimes, the biggest yet to come, the pedo rape connections from the Epstein papers.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 25 points 3 months ago (5 children)

My father, a lifetime Republican before Trump, and still a rather fiscally conservative man, was actually conflicted on whether or it would have been better or worse if Trump had died on that stage. He openly calls the man a Fascist these days.

Trump may be a Republican, but it's actually rather generous to call him a Conservative.

It wouldn't surprise me if someone would think Trump's death might return us to the Conservatism of the past, but I think that's flawed. The Republican party has always been on the wrong side of social politics, and there's no turning back from the stain of fascism on the party.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] CaptainKickass@lemmy.world 191 points 3 months ago (8 children)

They also said he was a terrible shot.

I'm not even kidding. He tried out for the school shooting club and they asked him not to come back because they considered his poor shooting and gun handling dangerous.

[–] YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world 111 points 3 months ago (1 children)

school shooting club

Maybe they should name it something else...

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 11 points 3 months ago

No, I think that's an accurate description

[–] Snailpope@lemmy.world 49 points 3 months ago (9 children)

LMFAO! I had a feeling he was conservative. It don't know about a terrible shot, he got damn close but if his school had a shooting club he was probably still better than someone untrained but could still be bad enough not to make the team. Like when I got cut from golf, a no cut sport, half way through the first day

[–] Pistcow@lemm.ee 26 points 3 months ago (4 children)

He's a bad shot because anyone with any bit of training or even youtube experience knows to aim center mass. More chance of hitting. I picked up shooting for sport in 2017 and can hit center mass with iron sites at the distance this kid was. With my cheapo scope, I can hit out to 300 yards.

He tried lolz x-gamer headshot and failed miserably.

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 42 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Maybe he did aim for the center...

[–] Pistcow@lemm.ee 14 points 3 months ago

And that would be even worse for a stationary target.

[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 22 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He had a lot of shots, at least three, so I'm not even sure he aimed at the head. If the story about the policeman distracting him is true, it means a boy on adrenalin tried his best to keep his aim straight in a hurry. I believe hitting Trump at all was an accident.

[–] Killing_Spark@feddit.de 22 points 3 months ago

This. I'm guessing that police man actually saved trumps life because the attempt had to be carried out in a rush and with at least a mild shock still in the system.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 months ago (12 children)

Trump was almost certainly wearing a vest

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 30 points 3 months ago (2 children)

A hit to a vest definitely has a real chance to kill him. Vests distribute the impact, but they're still massive chest trauma for a 70-something dude.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No way would USSS be able to get his fat ass to wear a vest consistently, let alone the plates needed to stop a rifle round. In this heat?

Though I'm sure now he may reconsider, or be forced to.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] voldage@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago (7 children)

Imagine if his motivation was to prove he had great aim and that they did him wrong. Maybe he just wanted to become the most well known sniper-assassin in the modern world. Maybe that's the reason he didn't use scope, he wanted his memory to be that of the rifle maverick. I wonder what went through his head after he realised he missed. I mean, other than a bullet.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Maybe he was aiming at a suspiciously Antifa-looking person in the crowd and missed?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] snooggums@midwest.social 114 points 3 months ago (4 children)

“It makes me wonder why he would carry out an assassination attempt on the conservative candidate.”

Trump is the Republican candidate, but anyone young enough to actually believes in conservative talking points would not see him as a conservative candidate and would see him as a threat to the party.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works 79 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Who's to say he didn't just want to die and take someone important out with him. In the mental state he was in at the time, he may not have even cared about politics.

[–] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 76 points 3 months ago (6 children)

I was thinking there's no proof he didn't do this to impress Jodie Foster. We may never completely understand

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 23 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Narrator:

Jodie Foster was not impressed.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 72 points 3 months ago (3 children)

It was a horrible incident and there is no room for violence in politics…

That said, I am relieved to know that the shooter is neither an immigrant nor a person of color, or a trans person. And not someone on the left. The violent backlash from the right would be unbearable/unthinkable otherwise.

But, rifles are an old way of doing things, and predict that there will be more political violence through the next years.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 59 points 3 months ago

And not one Republican or prominent journalist will point out that this is mostly due to the decade of rhetoric from the conservatives that political violence is the answer.

[–] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 31 points 3 months ago (43 children)

So…. Why then? Was he one of those rare conservatives that don’t like Trump? I think I’ve only ever met maybe one or two.

[–] tacosplease@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

There is a growing movement within conservative groups that want Trump out of the way so a more competent politician can enact their crazy goals more effectively. Nick Fuentes is one example.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

It is though any groups of people is not a monolith who perfectly toe the line with each other.

[–] Jackfinished@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

They usually don't talk about it because either they are lumped into trump supporters or attacked by the former for being a liberal pansy.

load more comments (40 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 31 points 3 months ago (11 children)

First: As conservatives love bible quotes: Hosea 8,7: "They sow the wind and reap the whirlwind." Boy, did Trump sow wind everywhere. And Thomas Crooks simply was the whirlwind this time.

Second: Each and every year, about 50,000 people in the US die from guns, and politics f-ing does not care. Because they love the money from arms manufaturers and votes from the gun nuts more than the mostly innocent people who die. But once the wrong asshole gets his ear nicked by a bullet, they suddenly fall over themselves condemning violence.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago (2 children)

One good deed does not redeem the entire sect

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago (8 children)

Was it really a good deed though? Because by missing, he gave Trump a shit load of political ammunition.

Trump is going to take this crisis and abuse it for every vote it gets him, and it's gonna get him a lot.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] DynoNoob@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago (4 children)

If Trump were to trip down the stairs and break his neck, that would be one thing. Becoming a martyr is another. And becoming a martyr while still alive is even worse.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Rakonat@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)

My money is the kid saw the 2025 agenda and despite being a conservative leaning person was still appalled at the idea people would vote for a fascist again.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

But the investigators say he “had no strongly held political beliefs”.

IOW he’s republican and they don’t want to broadcast it?

load more comments
view more: next ›