this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
52 points (93.3% liked)

Fuck Cars

9605 readers
639 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AdmiralShat@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The issue is that all of those apartments are owned by one person getting filthy fucking rich from rent.

[–] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Then organise the renters, let them buy the house to transform it into syndicate or cooperative housing. Social apartment construction isn't impossible.

[–] AdmiralShat@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The issue here is, in my country at least, the people who could possibly afford to buy one aren't wanting to live in an apartment and the people who live in apartments aren't capable of buying one.

It's not impossible, but it's also very unlikely

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rah@feddit.uk 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)

Why not prefer apartments in your own town?

Noise. Neighbours being closer.

[–] IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (7 children)

That’s only true if the apartment is a shitty American 5 over 1 stick building. In a modern concrete apartment with concrete internal walls you wouldn’t hear the neighbors.

[–] blueson@feddit.nu 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Exactly. Here in Sweden if you live into a newly built apartement you are basically guranteed grade A sound isolation.

Even older ones usually hold high quality because of renovations.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] baseless_discourse@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Uh yes, the suburban tranquility of non-stop leaf blowing, lawn mowing, and pickup humming.

Musics to my ears.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This isn't a particularly convincing analogy. Islands have limited space. The suburbs where I live border tons of open space and parks. Meanwhile, our school district is already overwhelmed with children, so converting commercial spaces into apartments will merely add to congestion and sprawl. NIMBY's make a convincing argument against denser residential construction.

A better focus would be the ability to simplify public transit and walkability. Town centers and public spaces could be more accessible with denser residential construction, and the additional green space can be closer to where you live without everyone needing their own half-acre yard to mow and water.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] AKADAP@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I spent seven years living in an apartment. I so enjoyed hearing the neighbors having sex, the thumping music they played, the smell of their cigarette smoke inside my apartment with all my windows closed, the random intrusions by management to repair something unrelated to my apartment, the random rent increases. Add this to the fact that I had no space for a work shop to make anything, and paying the equivalent of a mortgage with no equivalent home equity. Some people love apartment life, but it definitely was not for me.

[–] UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You hate shitty apartments, not apartments.

[–] brettvitaz@programming.dev 1 points 10 months ago

Every apartment I have ever lived in is this way, and I do not live in “shitty apartments”.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] XTornado@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Some of the points are unrelated like yeah you got higher rent but that is if you rent, nothing to do with being apartment or not. The same with the mortgage comment, you can buy apartments you know.

Then clearly those apartments were shit, on mine I usually don't hear anything of the other neighbors except if I am next to the wall connecting to them and they really make super noise or in the bathroom due the vents. And the smoke thing yeah... That also points to shitty insulation and air can get in.

The workshops thing yeah I get it. Technically you could setup something, of course small, if you have a spare room but based on the noise things you said probably not a good idea you might have gotten noise complaints.

[–] cubedsteaks@lemmy.today 1 points 1 year ago

I so enjoyed hearing the neighbors having sex

best thing to ever happen when I was a horny preteen. Neighbors moved in and boned EVERY night and that girl was LOUD as fuck. And holy shit was she cumming apparently lol

My mom was soooo mad. And she couldn't do anything about it cause the neighbors refused to acknowledge her!

[–] notatoad@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

the problem seems to be when people take "apartment life isn't for me" and then go to the conclusion of "they shouldn't build apartments for anybody"

you don't have to live in one. just let people build them. only allowing single family homes doesn't make single family homes more accessible for anybody, it just makes land more scarce and housing less affordable all around.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

This meme is advocating it as the only option

[–] kier@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Of course. Everyone can live in an apartment if they wish. I will be the one with the house at a reasonable distance.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 3 points 1 year ago

I'd rather see more than just housing if I have to live on a tiny fucking island.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You can still have trees and plant life in low density housing. You don’t need green deserts everywhere.

[–] ladam@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah fuck lawns too, they aren’t meant to exist

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tropic420@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But you still need way more infrastructure for the Houses.

[–] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yup, tons more parking and tons more road space per capita as well. Low-density sprawl just needs a lot more stuff per capita.

[–] whitecapstromgard@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The one on the left has no communal space. The one on the right does.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I don't really care. As a lifelong apartment dweller; I hate people and want nothing to do with them. Get me a house far away from civilisation and I'll be happy. Communal space, my arsehole.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] skulkingaround@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What is going on in this comments section? Building dense is massively better for the environment than SFH, both in the construction phase and for the life of the units as far more residents can be served with less infrastructure sprawl. It also doesn't mean that detached housing will suddenly stop existing if we let developers build densely packed housing. Doesn't even need to be high rises, it can be townhomes, duplexes, five-over-ones, etc. You'll still be able to get a white picket fence suburban home or a farmhouse on some acreage if you want. In fact, it will become cheaper because all the people who want to live in cities will actually be able to move there and not take up space in that low density area you want to live in.

[–] Tovervlag@feddit.nl 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I live in a dense area and around me is not nature but farmland. So nature goes to shit anyway.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] IanAtCambio@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This would just become a 100 apartment buildings.

[–] rexxit@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Exactly. People who advocate for densification are basically advocating for everywhere to be Amsterdam or NYC with continuous human habitation and maybe small concessions in the form of city parks (a joke compared to real natural areas, IMO).

I'm not sure if they're aware that this will be the logical conclusion of those policies.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd rather have a few cities and a lot of unspoilt nature than no cities and no nature, just suburban sprawl everywhere

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] kurzon@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

I won't consider living in apartment buildings unless they have good soundproofing and proper open spaces. I don't want to be cramped in with noisy neighbors and have no privacy.

[–] mrpants@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago

Apparently no one in the comments has seen people live outside of an American suburb.

[–] Squirrel@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 year ago

An island of this size should probably have neither.

[–] leanleft@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago

neither is good. A leads to sprawl. B leads to crime.

[–] biofaust@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Do you dare come say this here in Scandinavia please? FYI, you will suffer the date of Vigo the Carpathian, but I promis to erect a nice slab of stone for you.

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You know how computers were supposed to make life so easy we'd only have to work a few hours a week, and how that never happened.

This is the same thing.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

The per capita GDP massively increased. Are you saying your wages did not keep pace??

[–] Ginger666@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

Yeah, I love paying 2 grand a month for something I will never own.

load more comments
view more: next ›