this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
61 points (78.5% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3900 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aaaa@lemmy.world 51 points 4 months ago (3 children)

How is it that the general response to this debate is "Trump rambled nonsensically and told conflicting lies and wants to undermine democracy, but Biden was recovering from a cold, so he's unfit."

Like in what world are these issues comparable?

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 61 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Like in what world are these issues comparable?

Everyone who already knows that Trump is a moron can't actually develop a lower opinion of him.

Anyone who doesn't know that Trump is a moron is too dense to parse anything more complex than a ten-second Fox News soundbite.

Thus, Biden giving a mediocre performance hurts Biden much more than Trump doing his normal word-salad oral diarrhea hurts Trump.

It's not fair or logical, but it's the way things work at the moment.

[–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 4 months ago

Very generous of you to call it a "mediocre performance".

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago (4 children)

He was recovering from a cold? Is this really the excuse Democrats are gonna go with?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

but Biden was recovering from a cold, so he’s unfit.”

Literally haven't seen that excuse yet...

Has he been recovering from a cold the last decade?

[–] aaaa@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago (3 children)

The biggest thing people are complaining about was Biden was a little hoarse against Trump's booming nonsensical rambling.

I don't care if Biden was hoarse. At Trump's best, he made no sense, and at his worst, he was pushing terrible ideologies

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 24 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It seemed a lot worse than being a little hoarse. He was conflating issues, mid sentence. And getting confused regularly in addition to seeming really feeble and not being able to answer what is asked of him. Listen if this was the first i was seeing this from the president, then i might buy this is just him mid fever. But it’s not and is expected from a man at his age. Still voting for him, but i am thinking Kamala Harris is going to have to take over the presidency before long.

[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

In all honesty I think negotiating with Kamala for her to step into the AG role and open up the VP slot for Newsome or Buttigieg would be the game changer.

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

I don’t see our current trajectory as being successful, so this seems the only winning play. Not changing things risks everything for no good reason

[–] treefrog@lemm.ee 18 points 4 months ago

I hardly saw any mentions of him being hoarse reading through the megathread comments last night.

Stuff like, winning the war against Medicaid, on the other hand, as well as his general just got out of bed demeanor, is absolutely going to erode confidence in him and quite potentially cost progressives the election if they don't pick a different horse.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The biggest thing people are complaining about was Biden was a little hoarse

Who is saying that?

It's not in the article you're commenting on, and I haven't seen a single complaint about his voice being "hoarse".

Can you link what you're talking about where the main complaint about Biden was he seemed hoarse?

[–] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 37 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

both candidates are the age of my grandfather who lives with me because he needs care

no way either candidate has escaped the ravages of time

Biden and Trump both are selfishly keeping a younger generation from stepping in

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 31 points 4 months ago

Yup. Fuck them.

I'm voting for Biden, but fuck them both all the same.

[–] MisterNeon@lemmy.world 29 points 4 months ago

I hate this timeline.

[–] rickdg@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago (2 children)

These debates are only there for Biden to lose 🤷

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

And he certainly rose to the occasion last night.

[–] BackpackCat@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I don't understand why any one Biden's side thought this was a good idea. Biden has never been a good speaker I believe mostly due to his stutter. The only thing Trump knows how to do is talk he's a damn salesman. I guess the hope was that Biden could string together some coherent sentences in order to hit back at Trump's lies and tout his achievements. I just think putting your candidates weakest trait against the other candidates strongest trait was a stupid risky thing to do from the outset with limited positive potential.

[–] Manos@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So we should just do away with debates?

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

I think debates and townhalls are Biden's best bet right now. He needs to show that it was just a bad night for him.

And if it wasn't just a bad night, it'll spur action to find a viable replacement.

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.earth 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Such obvious bullshit.

He's leading the party just fine against Trump right now.

I'm saying this as someone that donated ~$1000 to Bernie.

I'm personally glad Biden is handling Ukraine & not Sanders.

You'd have to be astoundingly stupid to think that the DNC is going to change tack 5 months prior to the election.

EDIT: Oh look, there are 12 of them now.

[–] TheDannysaur@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Starting with a declaimer of being fairly far left...

Biden is not looking like he has a winning chance. He's barely leading in national polls, but those polls are misleading, as, because of the senate, democrats typically need to win by 2.5-3 points in order to have a shot at the electoral college. So he's behind there.

He's behind in several key states where he needs to win. If you count states where he's down 2 points or less, he BARELY has enough to win. Can't miss a single state.

The debate hurt Biden. This is not a logical contest, it's a popularity one, and Biden is not doing well. I think he's done some great policy things, but that's not how people vote. Democrats have to learn that it's not enough to be "right" if you're going to lose elections.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

He couldn't beat Trump in a relatively simple debate, how is he supposed to beat him in an election?

load more comments
view more: next ›