this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2024
1214 points (97.4% liked)

Political Memes

5509 readers
1842 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 213 points 5 months ago (10 children)

FDR was much closer to being a Social Democrat than a Democratic Socialist. They sound similar but are quite different. Hell I think Bernie is closer to a Social Democrat, too. He praises the Nordic model and they're textbook social democracies.

[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 62 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I've always felt that's just pragmatism from Bernie, and in truth he's ideologically a democratic socialist. If it makes any difference this is coming from a democratic socialist who's a member of a social Democrat party.

[–] Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world 33 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

I've always felt that's just pragmatism from Bernie,

If you read his book "It's Okay to Be Angry About Capitalism" it becomes very very obvious that this is the case. From quoting very radical anti-capitalists to tongue and cheek (somewhat) insider jokes such as naming the chapter on his time in mayoral politics "Socialism in one City", it shows he's definitely way more ideologically aligned with socialism than people give him credit for.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] aski3252@lemmy.ml 41 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (7 children)

He wasn't even a social democrat. At the time, social democrats were democratic socialists, the shift away from reformist socialism happened around the 80s (some social democratic parties still hang onto reformist socialism, at least in theory).

He was a smart liberal who realized that in order to save capitalism from collapsing again, some regulations are necessary. In Europe, similar policy was often pushed by social democrats, which sometimes leads to confusion. But actual social democrats at the time went (or at least wanted to go) further, like nationalization and socialization of major industry, worker representation at companies, and increasing worker and union power in general.

Social democrats stated endgoal was a socialist society. FDR's endgoal was to protect and maintain capitalism.

Edit: Also, Bernie is definitely a reformist socialist, I will never understand why people think otherwise. He literally mentions Eugen Debbs, one of the most influencial socialists in American history, as his role model and hero every chance he can.. And he praises the nordic model because the nordic model was literally pushed by reformist democratic socialists.. Here is Olaf Palme, one of the most important figures when it comes to the nordic model and prime minister of Sweden (until he was murdered), explaining why he is a democratic socialist:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=7i2Ws1X5DSA

Just imagine a conservative politican, calling themselves a fascist, keeping a picture of Mussolini on their desk, saying he is their political role model. Would you claim that he isn't really a fascist? It's not even as if Bernie Sanders was dog whistling, he couldn't be any clearer about his believes.. Yet somehow, so many American leftists seem to sonehow doubt his intentions? Why? Because he isn't radical enough? Because he isn't throwing molotov coctails at the police? What does he have to gain from falsely calling himself a socialist??

The man's presidental campaign was giving 20% of major corporations to it's employees and having about half of the board of directors be elected by workers, among other stuff..

if you don't even want to acknowledge his values and his ideology simply because he is playing the politics game and is a reformist, send him to Europe, we would love a genuine leftist like him with so much charisma. I don't think you appreciate him..

Imagine dedicating your life to fight for a better life, involve yourself in the civil rights movement, work in various socialist groups, calling yourself a socialist and calling for major industry to be socialised, being constantly attacked by right wingers for your socialist believes, etc, only for fellow leftists denying that you are a "real socialist"..

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 74 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

We have to face that loads of high ranking "moderate" Dems would prefer a Republican to a progressive.

If a Republican gets in office, it makes it easier to get people vote lesser of two evils.

If a progressive gets in office, it's really hard to unseat them. They can barely manage to get House Reps out for moderates even with AIPAC money.

If Bernie had won 2016, he'd have gotten to name the DNC chair, he could of solidly ended in the failed neo liberal experiment.

We were really fucking close to fixing things, but after NH got their delegates stolen, I don't think itll happen.

I honestly think if a real progressive wins a presidential ~~party~~ primary, the standing party might disregard it.

[–] hohoho@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I largely agree with you. Could you elaborate on your last sentence though?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago (1 children)

presidential ~~party~~ primary

There was an autocorrect there, but if that doesn't clear it up:

A primary isn't binding.

That was the DNCs legal argument for why if they rigged it, that would be legal.

The entire primary process is merely a survey.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago (6 children)

This is really a good argument for nonpartisan blanket primaries, which in other countries would be known as the first round of a two-round system. And it really should be advertised that way so people don't just write it off as "just a primary".

California adopts this system. You vote for one candidate in the primary. The top two candidates appear on the second round ballot. Most votes in the second round wins.

However, the fact that parties choose the candidates is really not unusual at all. In fact, the US is pretty unique in terms of how much influence voters have over the process. In most countries, interested candidates apply for the party's nomination, and then the party's central leadership or local party committee vets the applications and nominates their favourite candidate. Only the chosen candidate gets to stand with the party's rosette.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 66 points 5 months ago (11 children)

This is all Hillary and the DNC's fault and I will never fucking forgive them.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 41 points 5 months ago (19 children)

He also put Japanese Americans into internment camps, his New Deal policy led to institutional racism (red lining), and he ordered the FBI & IRS to investigate someone further left than him because he was worried they posed a political threat.

(Source on that last one: https://www.history.com/topics/crime/huey-long )

His left wing credentials are a bit lacking.

[–] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 47 points 5 months ago (9 children)

You're correct, but also missing the point. He implemented economic policies that were further left than any other US president.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 39 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I am pretty sure racism was institutionalized prior to New Deal....

[–] protist@mander.xyz 17 points 5 months ago

Red Lining itself was definitely established well before the New Deal, and the practice had spread across the US by the end of the 1920s

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] protist@mander.xyz 27 points 5 months ago (5 children)

There isn't a single leader in history who would pass your smell test. The reality is every human is complex and no one is all good or all bad. Except Andrew Jackson. Fuck that guy

But really, take a look, for example, at Lyndon Johnson. He was a renowned racist who ushered through the Civil Rights Act among many other progressive policies. He also escalated the Vietnam War. Dude did a lot of great things and a lot of bad things, and there's no single policy or act in his life that defines the entirety of his administration.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 18 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Actually just to wrench your caveat, Andrew Jackson was a major figure in the voting rights battle of the day, the right of non property owners to vote.

If it weren't for the Jackson admin, we wouldn't have the language we used to expand voting rights even further when those fights came to their crescendoes, and this country would still be entirely governed as a landowner oligarchy instead of just significantly like it is now.

That sounds sarcastic and cynical but there is a big difference.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago (2 children)

And annoyingly he is (along with the other Roosevelt) still among our best presidents in history. We really shoupd demand more from our representatives.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Nobody said economic leftists can't be racist.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Brickardo@feddit.nl 41 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Have you ever seen the man in the high castle? Well, we're definitely not in the worst timeline, but missing out on pals like Bernie shows that we're definitely not in the best either...

[–] el_abuelo@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

"Things could be worse" is always such a depressing reflection.

You're not wrong....but it sure is bleak isn't it!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 32 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Bernie ain't the first one that the corporate Democrats blocked either.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 18 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I have no idea who this is because I'm not American.

From the comments, I assume his name was Bernie?

[–] svc@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 66 points 5 months ago (2 children)

The person in the image is Franklin Delano Roosevelt, president of the United States from 1933 to 1945. He was effected to four terms and died in office, shortly after his fourth inauguration (now there's a two term limit). The name in the title refers to Bernie Sanders, who OP wishes had been nominated and elected in 2016.

[–] zzx@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

Well written informative comment, nice!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 18 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I would add to the other explanation only that they both represent the progressive wing of the nation's politics for their time, and are analogous to each other in that regard. Bernie is beloved and renowned for his civil rights activism and his incorruptible concern for regular folks and trying to make things better for people. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernie_Sanders#Political_positions

Bernie "walks the walk" as they say, and has for his entire career.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago (4 children)

That's right. Filibuster proof control for 4 months of the last 24 years.

You can go even further, filibuster proof control for 4 months of the last 44 years.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›