The other had escalated a courtroom argument with a defendant, which led to a police officer shooting the defendant to death.
Wait, what happened? That seems like as crazy of a story as this one.
this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2024
436 points (99.1% liked)
News
23284 readers
3481 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
This may be the incident, but it's low on facts so I can't be sure.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/defendant-dies-after-north-carolina-courtroom-shooting-n1278925
A second source with a bit more info.
And a third that verifies this is the same incident.
Your third source also includes a transcript of the conversation which led to the defendant rushing the judge. Very helpful for understanding the story here.
Seriously. He said his defense attorney was inadequate and asked for a different attorney. The judge said you take this one or you decide to represent yourself. And then the defense attorney asked to withdraw.
He never chose to defend himself. He never got the option to continue with his (to his mind) inadequate attorney. They made him defend himself for even questioning if he could get another attorney.
And then instead of explaining or trying to rectify the situation, she just yelled at him and sicced her goons on him.
Kind of proves his attorney was inadequate though
The article seemed intent on hiding the names of the judges but, thankfully, there aren’t many court shootings per year, per state. Could be this’n
One would think secretly squashing disciplinary action that was based on admitted violation of the judicial code would itself be a violation of the judicial code. WTF?!?
It is, but just like Clarence, Alito, etc on SCOTUS. Who holds them accountable for violating ethics or impartiality?
I read somewhere or other that 'no one is above the law', apparently that's a goal to be attained, rather than the current situation.
"yeah, that's true, but I'm not no one I'm ALITO! I do what I want!"
Thank you Propublica!
I'm so impressed by their work!
Just little artifacts of fascism setteling into the fabric of American society.
And it seems to be always tied to the conservatives / republicans.
Intake bias
If they had let it happen to those two, it could happen to any of them.
As it should.
Disgusting behavior by GOP is no longer surprising and that, in and of itself, is deeply troubling.
North Carolina citizens massively fucked up by sitting out the election for the state supreme Court seat and letting the incumbent Democrat get removed
Hope you do better in a few decades (hopefully sooner if one drops dead or has the fate they deserve)
Yay corrupt justice
I like the article, but are we giving up on the difference between "quash" and "squash" or has that train sailed?
AI isn't as smart as we are. ;)
Wonton and brazen corruption and misconduct by GOP agents at all levels, you say? Must be a day of the week.
And they are probably still judging 🤔. What are we? Retarded sand rock? Not just motionless objects, but practically useless ones?
Not "probably". The court literally declined to take any disciplinary action at all.
And Repub like to say they're not corrupt.