this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
790 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

58279 readers
4756 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] x00za@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

My country has made it illegal to not give your keys.

[–] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

What county is this, so I know to avoid it?

[–] Im_old@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)
[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Can’t I just say I forgot my pin? They can’t prove I don’t have a shit memory.

[–] Suburbanl3g3nd@lemmings.world 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That only works if you're rich

[–] sfxrlz@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Classic quality Land

[–] x00za@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You can use that argument but it will depend on if they believe you.

[–] GiveMemes@jlai.lu 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

How can they prove guilt? Innocent until proven guilty under English common law, right?

[–] x00za@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago

It's not about guilt. It's about whether or not you know the password. In most cases not knowing the password will be deemed improbable because the chances are extremely low. You'll have to provide a scenario where it becomes probable, and said scenario must be deemed probable as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulation_of_Investigatory_Powers_Act_2000

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nah, can't be, they said it was a European one and the UK voted to no longer be part of Europe. /s

[–] Im_old@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Incidentally, the European court for human rights said that that law violated the ECHR convention.

The UK said "yeah, so what?", which since they've left the EC it's legally right, but it's not a great outlook when you're told your laws violate human rights.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A lot countries have this now.

Even for a number of countries where it's not technically enshrined in law, police can still effectively do it anyway, by detaining you for as long as they like until you comply.

[–] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The solution is to simply shit yourself, without breaking eye contact, while under their custody to assert dominance.

[–] x00za@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago

Some European one.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago

Sounds like it's time for the deniably encrypted phone.