this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2024
172 points (95.7% liked)

Games

32467 readers
1246 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Anti piracy software that slows down your game

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Would buying the game and playing it legally still slow down the game?

[–] teuto@lemmy.teuto.icu 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes, cracked Denuvo games actually run better because you aren't running ~~a virus~~ anti piracy software in the background. It runs at the kernel level and Crowdstrike is a pretty good case study on why that's bad.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Alright. I guess I understand why the best option is to NOT buy this game. But not only that, we need to all make our voices heard that Civilization is a game we WANT to play, but will not buy until Denuvo is removed.

Vote with your wallets, and let them know this choice cost them millions of sales.

Otherwise the NEXT game will have this too. Because we tolerated it.

[–] skaffi@infosec.pub 6 points 2 months ago

Yes, that's the issue.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The “slows down your game” bit has always been hotly contested. There are certainly occasions where a modified exe without Denuvo runs faster, combined with accusations that that specific game integrated Denuvo in a very poor last-minute implementation that calls it dozens of times a second.

I don’t work on video games, but my own experience with software engineering and release management suggests those sorts of murky answers are likely to be the norm.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Cracked games with Denuvo removed run significantly faster.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Given that I already mentioned there are anecdotes of that happening under poor coding, I sincerely hope you have a more reliable source for that.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How about a YouTube video people love it when I use those as a source

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5y_bab5wtHY

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

There's nothing contested about it. Add a bunch of extra operations to the game loop and you can slow down a game. You only have so much headroom in each frame. Dunova takes up a lot of that time. And let's not forget you can literally go tests with games that had denovu and then removed it. The testing shows pretty clearly that it does indeed slow down games.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

...Great, so you're going to start giving just as much criticism to devs for writing debug logs every so often?

There's an order of magnitude between a difficult task slowing operations, and pure inefficiency / bad coding doing it. Can you describe something that actually proves you know the slightest thing about how programming works?

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world -3 points 2 months ago

I work in software... how about that.