this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
494 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19233 readers
2281 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 111 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

my mom believes that we're being "invaded" by illegals. i said, "stop using that term. it's offensive and racist."

"that's what they are. they broke the law," she shot back.

"and you're offensive and racist. and i suppose that means you're an illegal, too, since you jaywalked earlier?" I replied.

"illegal immigrants are felons!" she shouted at me.

"like Trump? so, he's a 34-times illegal, then? and you're voting for him?"

"that's different!" she screamed

there's no reasoning with these people

[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 63 points 3 months ago (2 children)

You can't reason people out of a position they didn't reason themselves into

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ain’t that a fucking truth. Ironically, it was my grandfather, my mother’s father, who first told me that

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

my favorite wisdom that has been passed down and not followed is: "Don't believe everything you see on the Internet"

Gullible turds.

[–] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 6 points 3 months ago

Well put. They're just following the orders they get from fox "news"

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 47 points 3 months ago (2 children)

trump the illegal, I like it.

[–] Tyfud@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago

Third generation draft dodger.

His grandfather escaped Germany so he didn't get drafted for WWI.

All in the family.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@piefed.social 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ivan the terrible.

Putin the humiliated.

Trump the illegal.

[–] aruraios@fedia.io 2 points 3 months ago

To give Ivan some credit, his title is so old that it originally meant something more like Ivan the Terri_fying_

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

It's my understanding that illegally entering the country is a misdemeanor, and illegally reentering the country is a felony. It is an amplifying action for a huge number of other felonies though. Am I wrong? 8* Usc section 1325 vs 8 Usc section 1326.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

It was always my understanding that entering the country to claim asylum was not illegal at all

[–] SwampYankee@mander.xyz 11 points 3 months ago

It's also a civil violation, not a criminal one.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 7 points 3 months ago

Not all laws are just.

I was on a grand jury once and most of the charges were for marijuana. I tried to convince the jury we should nullify, because sending teenagers to jail for pot is cruel. No one took me up on this. (A grand jury is simple majority, and the defense has no role in the proceedings. Side note: every time a cop isn't indicated it's because the prosecutor didn't want to.)

There was a little old white lady who sat behind me on the jury. She said well that's the law and if it's bad we should change it. Fine, I said. But imagine it's 1950 and you're on a trial for a black man who sat at an all white's counter. Would you indict? Would that be the right thing to do?

She went, "oh.. mm I don't know". And I don't think she meant because of peer pressure or imagining she only had the perspective of a white person from the 50s. I think she was just a very Lawful-Neutral person.

Anyway. The point I was trying to get at is a lot of people have garbage moral reasoning.