this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
386 points (90.4% liked)

News

23367 readers
2823 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mercano@lemmy.world 106 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Sad, from a nostalgia point of view, but probably a win, environmentally. We have a pipeline to recycle plastic bottles, the mylar pouches are pretty much all single use.

[–] steal_your_face@lemmy.ml 116 points 2 months ago (4 children)

We actually don’t have a pipeline to recycle plastic bottles though, right?

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 42 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Bottle deposit systems are generally effective. In Sweden, 90-95% of the pet plastic in drink bottles makes it back to a factory to be used as raw material for new bottles. We don't really recycle the hdpe lids or polyester labels, though.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Why aren't we just using glass, as we did for decades just fine.

[–] Creat@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 2 months ago (5 children)

That's not actually a solution when talking single-use either. Remaking the bottles from recycled glass is incredibly energy intensive and not an environmentally friendly process either. Multi-use bottles are much better, but the cleaning required also isn't that simple and also relatively energy intensive (far from remaking the bottles of course).

There's also practical downsides to glass (heavy, breakable), but those are subjective and their relevance highly depends on the use case.

Ideally, we wouldn't buy stuff to drink in any kind of bottle, but just use tap water. possibly just buy some concentrated stuff to then make your actual drink at home. Nothing beats the effectiveness of transporting water through a simple pipe, but that isn't even possible everywhere in the world due to drinking water quality issues...

[–] Muffi@programming.dev 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A lot of glass bottles aren't melted down, but simply washed and reused.

[–] Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A surprising number of companies actually do sell powder versions of their drinks on the web. I buy both Arizona tea and A&W root beer packets online.

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Holy shit I didn't realize you could buy root beer concentrate, this is amazing. I'm totally stocking up next time I'm in the US.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

If micro plastics in the water supply is an actual issue long term the tap water will be shot for the whole of most places. Reverse osmosis systems are the only ones I had heard could reliably help, but I haven't gone to extensive on looking into that. Each household may someday need under the sink or such systems if so : /. Unless we can reliably do so at treatment plants and then transport it through the lines without the water getting any back in. With many American cities having water at its current state, I don't see that happening.

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Well that would be because the god-king CEO would have like 45k less per year out of his 38,000,000 dollar salary without bonuses and stock value if we were to do that, you fuckin peasant idiot chump. Not only that but their enabling middle management might have as much as $200 less in their annual bonuses. Think for someone else other than yourself for once.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 months ago

Our school won’t let us send reusable glass containers excuse of fear of breakage.

I kinda understand, but our first grader has been using them for snacks at home for 5 years and never broken one.

[–] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

When you say "we" as in you and me, yeah, I don't think we could manage to recycle them. "We" as a planet certainly can and many countries do.

[–] steal_your_face@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago

Which countries? I thought only 9% of plastic is actually recycled.

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 34 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But much better to use aluminium.

[–] squozenode@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

At least aluminum actually is recyclable.

[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There is still a plastic liner on the inside, glass, stainless steel or nothing

[–] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz -2 points 2 months ago

Plastic and glass aren't recyclable huh? Better just throw them in the landfill, much better.

[–] Melonpoly@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Recycling bin > recycling lorry > container > third world country > sea.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

...do you not believe bottles are recycled? Or is this just a snarky way of pointing out how ineffective the system is?

[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

If you think recycling is effective you have fallen to their propaganda

[–] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Oh no, something is ineffective, we better abandon the whole idea!

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yes, actually. We should abandon the whole idea. We should actually stop using plastics for everything. That's the correct take.

Something like 9% of plastic gets recycled.

[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

No, I want an effective system starting with the producers of waste

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Great, you not only read my mind but you are also spreading gloom about an extremely well known issue. Beautiful.

I don't think I could have lived in society for the past 15 years without hearing about this issue at least 5 times a year, and I'm not sure what made you think otherwise.

[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I want change, ignoring the problem doesn't makebthe issue go away

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

So if I ask what a person means with their snark, it means I want the problem to be ignored?

That's a sad and weird way to assume shit, honestly. Because if you actually knew my view, you would know that I think about plastics fucking the human race every day of my life

[–] Melonpoly@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If you even thought to say that, I can't blame you for your original comment.

Yeah, it's really sad how bad plastic is currently destroying our environment. Humans have to be able to see further into the future than "will I live to see the consequences of my actions? Because if not, I can't worry about them"

[–] Melonpoly@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I agree,

It pisses me off that you can slap a recycling logo on a plastic bottle and call it a day when the process is nearly impossible and hardy ever done.