this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
37 points (95.1% liked)

Canada

7133 readers
423 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


๐Ÿ Meta


๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories


๐Ÿ™๏ธ Cities / Regions


๐Ÿ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


๐Ÿ’ป Universities


๐Ÿ’ต Finance / Shopping


๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Politics


๐Ÿ Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When I think of the next federal election, I get a feeling of hopelessness. I feel like we're screwed no matter what.

Without any hope of electoral reform, I wonder if we can instead use the tools we have better.

Independents running always seems like a long shot. The cards are stacked against them. But would it be possible to make it easier for them?

One of my thoughts would be to use technology. Create a platform for people to engage with their local riding, stripped of obvious party association. And not pay-to-play for candidates.

Does an idea like that have merit? Do you have any other ideas?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

ALWAYS:

  1. pick the least-worst candidate who a) can win the job and b) do good for regular Canadians like Canadians.

  2. vote for that guy.

  3. Repeat .

This isn't hard. You don't need to feel defeatist about it, but you need to understand you're not shooting for perfection so much as just getting the best of the bad options.

[โ€“] karlhungus@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it is hard. All their platforms look the same, it's difficult to find their voting records. Even their promises can't be trusted.

And since the candidates you hear the most about tend to be the leaders there's a bias to vote for a party, rather than your representative.

Beyond that issues are often things I'm not particularly knowledgeable about, so I don't know say how bad bringing in pay for healthcare would be for the public system (you've got to read studies to know that shit).

In make believe land I think that only impacted and experts would have a say. So corporate interests wouldn't get quite so much say, and distribution would be better. And farmers would get more say on ag related issues and technical people would get more say on things like DRM... But really that also probably just turn to shit.

[โ€“] villasv@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it is hard. All their platforms look the same, itโ€™s difficult to find their voting records. Even their promises canโ€™t be trusted.

Here's the key to democratic participation: you have to keep paying attention to politics. Even if voting records were easy to find, it's SUPER hard to form an opinion because you'd need to recover all the context and discussions during the voting times. Sometimes good politicians will vote against decent laws due to practicalities that you'll miss if you just glance at a table.

So it is hard to filter for candidates who "do good for regular Canadians", not because it's hard to find information, but because most people are trying to cram the elections, and you really can't. If you're not willing to spend that energy keeping up with politics, find someone you trust that do and just ask that person for a detailed opinion.

[โ€“] karlhungus@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

It's cool to have someone agree with me so much

[โ€“] 4vr@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

With every iteration candidates will keep getting worst.