this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
1112 points (100.0% liked)

196

16552 readers
2654 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 53 points 3 months ago (9 children)

the reason is children. for some reason the most recent generation of kids requires apps instead of sites. god forbid they have to remember an address.

just look at the fuckload of people who cant use lemmy without an 'app'

this is one of my peeeves

[–] NorthWestWind@lemmy.world 37 points 3 months ago (2 children)

My high school computer teacher once ranted about this to us. He said the younger students are lacking the basic concepts of computer stuff. They are spoiled too much to not even know what a file browser is.

[–] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's the parents fault too for not teaching the kids.

[–] MrQuallzin@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Eeh, I see it as a gray area. Majority of millenials, myself included, grew up learning about novel technologies as they developed. We learned how to use desktop computers and browse the internet during a 'golden age' of innovation. They became part of our everyday lives and are second nature to us. The next generations don't fully have that experience but are expected to natively know their way around a computer since they're so ubiquitous in our lives. In reality, they know how to use smart phones and chromebooks but aren't getting the experience of working on a real desktop computer.

Regarding teaching kids the basics, I'd put it on the schools, not the parents. Do schools still have computer labs? That'd be where proper computer skills should be taught. If parents can help at home that's great, but I don't think it should be expected that every kid is going to have a real computer at home to learn on (versus phones, tablets, chromebooks, etc).

[–] ReveredOxygen@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He's the computer teacher. Maybe he should teach them about computers

[–] NorthWestWind@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

He did teach them. He was just comparing different generations of students.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

One of the reasons I like apps for Lemmy is for notifications.

Coincidentally, one of the reasons companies like apps is for notifications.

[–] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Your mobile browser supports notifications per site like an app. It even supports custom icons per site when the notification pops up.

You don't even know if the telemetry leaving your phone to the app server is using TLS encryption, you just let them hail-mary football-throw send it.

I don't understand why we insist on bending over and freely giving away our data to fucking apps.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 3 points 3 months ago

I don’t understand why we insist on bending over and freely giving away our data to fucking apps.

Some people are extremely averse to the discomfort of the slightest speedbump in their computer/phone usage and are more than willing to give their "worthless" data in return.

[–] Nelots@lemm.ee 16 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

One benefit an app for something like Lemmy offers is significantly better customization.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

thats a copout for the site sucking. lemmy looks like someone forgot the css. one of the reasons i chose mbin, its not fugly and very user-configurable. .

no app required

[–] gwen@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 months ago

one of the reasons i picked dbzer0 is that the layout just looks Better (ie doesnt look like someone forgot the css) :]

[–] Vespair@lemm.ee 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I mean, I think part of it is because they grew up interacting with apps because parents were, mostly rightly, restricting their children from use of the greater unrestricted web. Every modern parent I know had children who knew which apps on mommy or daddy's phone they were allowed to touch - their games or youtube kids or whatever. These apps provided easy safeguards for parents to rein in their child's internet experience. Even if these methods weren't perfect in their attempt (Elsagate and all that), this was still good practice for allowing your child access to modernity in the times you couldn't fully devote your time to overseeing their activity with relative confidence they were probably not watching wildly inappropriate content.

In a perfect world parents and educators would also be devoting time to teaching their child to navigate the internet and allowing them monitored (with physical eyeballs, not tracking) online browsing time, but I don't think we can rightly fault the kids for not having received that. Rather than grumbling about the situation, I think we'd be better served accepting it for what it is and instead approaching the topic from a stance of: how do we teach them better behavior and help them unlearn these bad habits?

edit: typo

[–] P4ulin_Kbana@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You don;t need to put "edit: typo" in your comment. /lh

[–] Vespair@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

I'm aware, but I do it to ensure readers that the content of my message hasn't changed in the time since the edit, I'm just cleaning up the syntax. It's a matter of attempting to provide a consistent face.

[–] Infernal_pizza@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

If it’s a service I use regularly on my phone like Lemmy then an app usually does provide a better experience. The UI is usually better optimised and they tend to load faster. However if I’m only using it once, or if I’ve just visited your site then stop trying to get me to use the fucking app! That goes for Reddit as well, I have the app installed but if I’m just trying to view a post because I googled something I don’t want to be forced into the app

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I'm not a child. But I already have an entire OS running on my phone. Why would I run a browser on top (with all of its UI clutter) so I can use an app.

If I'm going to use an app often, for more than a couple minutes each time, I'm gonna use an app. If I'm just visiting a site for the first time, or I'm just going to stay there a couple seconds (search engines), I'm using the web browser.

Browsers are for browsing the web. Apps (run by the OS, not by a web browser) are for doing things.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Browsers are for browsing the web. Apps (run by the OS, not by a web browser) are for doing things.

hahahahhahhaahahha

im deep in the corporate, non-app web-based environment. this comment is so out of touch. i get that its your POV, but its not even close to the broader reality that most apps are just packaged websites and that browsers are nearly fully virtual machines and incredibly capable.

again, the apps exist generally because they want to capture more data than the browser allows (they are exploiting you). theres very little functionality that cant be run in the browser directly.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

That sounds like a shit app. I just don't use those. And if I have to use them, it's rarely enough that they fall into browser's scope.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 6 points 3 months ago

A large quantity of apps are thinly disguised browsers "stuck" on a specific web page and with extra tracking and data collecting capability. I'd wager all shopping apps are this.

[–] tootnbuns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They just haven't seen the light yet - I feel like most people from every generation are app'd up.

[–] P4ulin_Kbana@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I prefer using Lemmy with an app because apps are better designed for my screen than an website. It's kind of rare finding an website that looks good on portrait.

right, the lemmy website is garbage. many others are not. i have zero issue using mbin, accessing lemmy content without an app on my mobile device in portrait.

no app needed, but its because mbin is designed as modern sites should be. dynamically scaled to the requested interface.

again, if your website isnt absolute garbage no app is required.

[–] averyminya@beehaw.org 1 points 3 months ago

Apple brainwashed us with iPod 3Gs and apps

Also people can use Lemmy without apps, it just doesn't have all the same features in the UI which is why people use wrappers