politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
"gaining on"? IDK about british English, but in the states "gaining on" someone means you're approaching them from the rear.
That's a mighty weird way to say she has greatly increased an already-existing lead over Trump.
It makes sense in context. Biden was quickly losing the advantage, and Harris gained it back immediately.
Even in context, she may be gaining back losses, but the phrase "gaining on Trump" is still incorrect if she is ahead of him.
Leapfrogs is the verb(?) they are looking for.
No, again that's coming from behind. You leap ahead of someone like in a game of leapfrog.
"Pulls ahead of" would have worked as that can mean that she's behind and then overtakes, or is already ahead and increases that lead.
Trump has made massive inroads since 2016 among Hispanic voters. Their phrasing is definitely weird no doubt but I get what they’re trying to say
For us (UK) it means to catch up to (statistically), we don't have the colloquialism you do.
Wow word salad.
it's a British newspaper so it'll use British terms.
gaining on means to come from behind in British the same as it does in American
the headline is misleading, "pulling ahead of" should have been used but that's not clickbate enough.
the independent is a piece of shit since it went online only.
It's a bad headline dude. Really misleading.