Of course there's a fee. Do they not realize how expensive it is to fileserve useless videogame data, provide versioning for that, updater systems, workshop storage, curation, promotion etc etc. . . without help?

Is there not a fee for your competing storefront? How would it fund its daily operations?

[–] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The workshop alone is already a godsend (from Lord Gaben).

There are decade old games with hundreds of thousands of mods, who's paying for all the hosting?

Has anyone tried Epic Store? It has nothing but the most barebone features to purchase a game, literally just a glorified launcher.

[–] TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Right? Steam provides better service and functionality than any other PC storefront. It's ridiculous that there's so much whining about them charging for it. So what if it's a higher percentage? It's also a better service and a large audience. Whoever doesn't like it is free to go elsewhere, unlike console games that can only be sold though the manufacturer's store.

[–] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 2 points 3 months ago

If any digital game store deserved to be sue, it's Nintendo hand down. That's the real monopoly store with a "fuck you because we can" attitude.