this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2024
506 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

60140 readers
2067 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0x0@programming.dev 205 points 5 months ago (7 children)

We must cut all options for the end user to own anything, let'em pay subscriptions instead.

In a SONY board meeting, probably.

[–] new_guy@lemmy.world 90 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

Why are we suddenly selling more NAS grade HDDs?

  • Seagate executives
[–] Infynis@midwest.social 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] ag10n@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago
[–] glimse@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Something tells me the market for media servers is very different than the market for BD-R. The only benefit to having a collection of burned discs over a NAS is that you can let people borrow them. It's otherwise mostly downsides

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 5 points 5 months ago

If they were cheaper I'd use them for archival purposes. They work well as cold storage.

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

If you have a Nas... install plex or jellyfin and you can still let them "borrow" it all the same...

Far from a "downside".

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 8 points 5 months ago

If you have a NAS you might know you should have a backup on different media.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Are we back to trusting Seagate again? Last I knew their spinning rust was t trust worthy. I've had 6 drives fail me in the last 2 decades, and all but one or two were Seagate, so I just assume their bad anymore and go with other suppliers.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Every drive I've had fail, personally or professionally, has been a Seagate drive.

[–] TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee 8 points 5 months ago

Every drive I've had failed was WD. My Seagates have been mostly fine

[–] pikmeir@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

I've had both Seagate and WD drives fail. I just think drives fail rather commonly.

Seagate does seem to have a higher failure rate, but they are also cheaper. From this article:

The oldest (average age of 92.5 months) hard drive Backblaze tested was a 6TB Seagate (ST6000DX000). Its AFR was 0.11 percent in 2021 and 0.68 percent in 2022. Backblaze said this was "a very respectable number any time, but especially after nearly eight years."

...

"In general, Seagate drives are less expensive and their failure rates are typically higher in our environment," Backblaze said. "But, their failure rates are typically not high enough to make them less cost-effective over their lifetime. You could make a good case that for us, many Seagate drive models are just as cost-effective as more expensive drives."

Their oldest drives are Seagate as well, so that's saying something.

Whether a drive will be reliable for you is less related to the manufacturer and more related to capacity and luck.

Here's an anecdote from Reddit:

I've had numerous hard drive failures over the years -- nothing atypical, I just use lots of drives, and like almost everything else, they have stochastic failures. But between Seagate and WD, the Seagate drives all at least let me know they were going to fail soon, via SMART monitoring, and gave me (just) ample time to get all of my data off of them before completely dying. My WD drives that failed did so instantaneously, without any prior indication of problems.

But this could also be luck, idk. My takeaway is:

  • Seagate has a little higher failure rate, which explains why they're often cheaper
  • Seagate may do a good job detecting errors with SMART
  • all drives fail and whether one will fail before another is more likely up to luck than any systemic issue by a manufacturer
[–] new_guy@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I genuinely don't know. Their name was just the first one that came to my mind.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 44 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Eh, I doubt many people are burning their own Blu-ray discs - this does not apply to discs you buy that already have films on, those are manufactured differently, and are still being made.

But even if you do archive your personal data onto Blu-ray discs, there are still other manufacturers besides Sony.

This really isn't a big deal.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 18 points 5 months ago (2 children)

This really isn’t a big deal.

Sure. One tiny bit at a time...

[–] MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Really though, who burns Blu rays. Yes I'm sure there's a handful of people out there doing it but I don't know anyone who's still burning discs in 2024. Storage space is large and cheap now and way less hassle than discs. Companies as big as Sony can't keep producing products for a tiny market it just doesn't make sense.

Yup. I use a NAS to not have to deal with disks. I'd rather buy a couple more drives than have to store even more stuff at home.

[–] FangedWyvern42@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Who still burns discs (outside of retro gamers) in 2024, let alone Blu-Rays? They aren’t killing the whole format.

[–] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 18 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Nah, probably just didn't sell enough, with USB sticks around and all.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

I don't think I've ever seen anyone use the format. CDR saw a lot of use, but who needs bluray nowadays?

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I believe they've said that this doesn't change their production of non-rewritable Blu-rays.

[–] SuspiciousPumpkin421@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Do you have a source for this? That was my worry tbh.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

Just did a quick search and found this headline on a site that I've never heard of before. Unfortunately, I forgot where I initially read it, lol

https://www.tweaktown.com/news/99072/sony-wont-phase-out-blu-ray-movie-and-game-discs-only-ceasing-production-on-consumer-bd/index.html

[–] hesusingthespiritbomb@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Different divisions. This is more akin to when Sony decided to stop making floppy disks. The market is there for now, but it's just not worth it from a financial perspective.

The amount of people burning their own blu rays is minimal. Even the type of people who emphasize owning their own content just use a NAS system.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is more akin to when Sony decided to stop making floppy disks. The market is there for now, but it’s just not worth it from a financial perspective.

Ironically Japan is just now phasing out floppies, so there'll still be a market for a while.

A NAS is mostly geared for online media storage, whereas disks are for offline.

[–] BlueMacaw@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

That's just the government though, similar to how a lot of the systems in the US still run on COBOL (including the IRS).

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 2 points 5 months ago

Ironically those who own their own NAS and hoarding data are amongst the more likely to be burning their own Blu-rays

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I mean sure, but Jellyfin and HDDs exist, and are much more convenient than burning a Blu-ray that you have to put in a drive to watch.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 1 points 5 months ago

Optical disks tend to be used for offline archival storage more than movies (IIRC they'll still be printing out Blu-Ray movies, just not blanks).

[–] FangedWyvern42@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

This is not as big a deal as you think. Blu-Ray production itself isn’t ending, they just aren’t making any more rewritable Blu-Rays. Most people aren’t going to be burning stuff to Blu-Rays. You’ll still be able to buy Blu-Rays if you want a physical copy of a film.