this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
213 points (96.5% liked)

World News

39004 readers
2660 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The industry that has traditionally powered about a quarter of GDP has been in a downward spiral that policymakers have struggled to halt

All across China, from Beijing in the north, to Shenzhen in the south, millions of newly built homes stand empty and unwanted. There were nearly 391m sq metres of unsold residential property in China as of April, according to the National Bureau of Statistics. That is the equivalent of Manchester and Birmingham combined – and then some – sitting as vacant, unwanted property.

This glut of idle property has caused a headache for the government, shaken the world’s second largest economy and raised tensions over the purpose of housebuilding in a nation where property investment had been viewed as a safe bet.

Since the real estate sector was sent into a tailspin in 2020, caused by the pandemic and a sudden regulatory crackdown, the industry that has traditionally powered about one-quarter of GDP has been in a downward spiral that policymakers have struggled to halt.

The crux of the problem is that, with shaky faith in the economy and big property developers failing to deliver on paid-for apartments, potential homebuyers are keeping their money out of the market.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] viking@infosec.pub 83 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I live in China. Trust me, you don't want to have those homes in the US. The house I live in has been completed in 2016 and I'm the first tenant, moved in in 2018, and it's got more issues than my dad's house from 1965. Houses here are built as cheaply as possible, skimping on building materials, safety, plumbing, insulation, wiring, etc.

The pricing bubble is just a joke on top. The actual value of the real estate here should be about 20-25% of what it is in reality - for example if I were to buy the house I'm renting right now, I'd break even after 114 years. Not taking any repairs or interest into account.

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 6 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Sadly, that’s not much different than the US

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 39 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

We're talking about high rise buildings with cardboard mixed into the concrete that collapse within less than 5 years in many many cases. They often don't have plumbing or electricity as they are only constructed to get people to invest in property, not to live in them. US citizens really don't know how much regulations and their enforcement are doing for them.

[–] zephyreks@lemmy.ml -2 points 5 months ago

How many new builds have collapsed in <5 years? If you're claiming many many, you should be able to cite at least 5, right?

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Nah, the situation is way different in the US. The construction quality is way way better due to building codes and actual enforcement of that. Though some construction does fall through the cracks, it's a good bet that the vast majority of construction here is safe. There is a pricing bubble here, but that's for different reasons. And renting here is nowhere near as cheap as this person says. They said it would take 114 years to pay back the cost of a house compared to renting. In the US, rent is usually slightly more or even much more than a mortgage and goes up over time, so your worst case scenario is less than 30 years.

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yes. One reason why new housing in the US is expensive is because there are way more regulations now than there were years ago. Houses now are much safer and built better. But that makes them more expensive.

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Tell me about it. I'm in the middle of construction right now, and the various hoops I've had to jump through and mazes of codes I've had to navigate are insane. And it all makes things so much more expensive. And the number of inspections and permit plan check meetings I've had to do has taken so much of my time.

I probably shouldn't have tried to GC this myself.

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago

Remember that all of those regulations are for a reason. Sometimes the reason is "contractors donated money to an elected official, but it's usually a good result. It's better to have higher quality than lower.

[–] dumblederp@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

G'Day from the land down under of dogshit-quality housing-bubble-overpriced new builds. God I love how much money corporations are making.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Seriously, that describes what I've seen in the housing market these days to a T

[–] zephyreks@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You wouldn't want US homes in Europe, either. Most of the world has astonishingly shit construction in the name of higher profits and the understanding that housing has very limited lifespans.

Some US homes are great - robustly built, well-insulated, quiet, no leaky sewage, no leaky building membrane, wires routed properly, etc. Unfortunately, a lot of them were built decades ago. If you're evaluating them in terms of materials or construction quality, US housing quality has gone straight off a cliff. Sure, there's a bunch of glass facades on new buildings, but they hide the fact that sound insulation between units is nonexistent, the heat insulation is barely slapped together, the outlets aren't all plugged in, and the hot water either turns completely on or completely off. Tour a new California townhouse and tell me again that it's not built as cheaply as possible. Developers have figured out how to be stingy on everything you can't see and instead dump money on fancy appliances and a marble countertop... Even if the toilet clogs if you look at it funny and you can hear your neighbour three doors down humming to himself.

Meanwhile, most US new build apartments are 5 over 1s, which are notorious for being a tinderbox. Though, US fire code is really well done, so if there's a fire odds are you can make your way out in time.

[–] viking@infosec.pub 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Oh true, my dad's house that I used to compare the ones in China to is in Germany.

[–] zephyreks@lemmy.ml -1 points 5 months ago

Yeah, German houses are so nice man. Like I don't think I could get a US builder to build me a German house if I tripled their budget. They just don't know how.