this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
64 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37609 readers
131 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] darkphotonstudio@beehaw.org 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Anti-AI is a brain-dead idea anyway. Artists should be more open with their art, not less. Yes, even with AI.

[–] Vodulas@beehaw.org 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Are you saying artists should be OK with AI companies stealing their art an using it without permission?

[–] darkphotonstudio@beehaw.org 4 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Well, if you don't copyright everything, then it's not stealing. We need more open culture, not closed off "IP".

[–] Vodulas@beehaw.org 4 points 3 months ago

The issue there is that we still live in a capitalist hellscape, and artists need to make money to survive. Until we have a situation where artists can make art and not worry about where their rent (yes, fuck landlords) or food, they will need to be able to make a living somehow.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

On principal I agree, but have you thought about how artists are to make a living? It is already hard now, so how should they make money in the future?

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] darkphotonstudio@beehaw.org 1 points 3 months ago

The same way they are now? Copyright is barely a protection for independent artists, and largely serves the interests of big "IP" holders like Disney.

[–] Paragone@beehaw.org 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You don't have to do ANYthing in order to have copyright on your images.

That is standard throughout the Berne convention & has been for decades.

Registering makes court-cases easier to win, but having copyright on one's renditions isn't in any way requiring that one have registered anything with anybody.

[–] darkphotonstudio@beehaw.org 1 points 3 months ago

Ok, but that is beside the point. Copyright only serves the interests of large IP holders, like Disney.