this post was submitted on 19 May 2024
251 points (81.5% liked)

People Twitter

5197 readers
790 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 209 points 5 months ago (5 children)

This is satire. Looking at ChrisJBakke's Twitter feed, his posts are jokes. You may not like them. They may not be funny. But they're jokes.

This one echoes a Lemmy post from a few days back:

I think we'd have a much better time on Lemmy if we chilled out. OP posts a lot of decent content, there's no need to shoot the messenger.

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 57 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Thanks. This just happens sometimes on here though, so I usually just leave it be and keep posting. It doesn't get to me.

I've noticed that a significant portion of Lemmy is very literal, so occasionally jokes that rely too much on satire, sarcasm, absurdism, or meta/anti-jokes tend to fall flat.

I thought the idea of someone going to a rich area and shorting the stock of companies whose employees who are sunbathing was a funny bit, but I suppose it's not if you think the guy is trying to give literal financial advice.

[–] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml 22 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I am one of those very literal people and admit to not understanding a lot of satire. I try and keep quiet though until I see other comments so I know what's going on. Sorry people get after you sometimes, you're practically the glue holding Lemmy together

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

Thanks for being cool <3

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 16 points 5 months ago (2 children)

You have a thicker skin than I do.

I've noticed that a significant portion of Lemmy is very literal, so occasionally jokes that rely too much on satire, sarcasm, absurdism, or meta/anti-jokes tend to fall flat.

Yeah. I feel like Lemmites have some very firmly held beliefs and they will defend them to the death. That isn't bad - most of us are here because of those beliefs - but it can make for a really bland community.

Thanks for all your posts. I enjoy them.

[–] figaro@lemdro.id 21 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Honestly Lemmy sucks because people here are all try-hard assholes who are incapable of seeing nuance. Anytime I comment on anything I somehow end up offending some segment of the Marxist left. Which baffles me because I'm rather far left as well, but they are too caught up in trying to prove I am an idiot to realize I'm literally on their side on 99% of topics.

It's pretty discouraging and I've kinda stopped wanting to interact here.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

people here are all try-hard assholes who are incapable of seeing nuance.

I'm seeing this as more of a societal/cultural problem. I'm getting up there in years and I have never seen a culture so obtuse and ready to argue constantly and I can directly correlate it with the advent of social media and the ability for people to nurture only like-minded communities and never be challenged or have to compromise or even just think.

It's getting worse all the time, and people with insight and means are using this to influence people and create movements that would have been laughable a couple decades ago. Flat Eartherism? MAGA? Qanon? Rising tides of woman-hating young men living in their own little lonely worlds? Fucking nazis? These are the kinds of absurd trends that might have been relegated to tiny communities of social rejects, not given voice or respect by anyone. Now they're just growing mobs of people lost in their little safe-spaces losing touch with reality more and more every day.

[–] blaine@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

My last 6 posts were removed and I was called a Russian troll for daring to suggest that Biden's support of the Palestinian genocide is going to cost him the election. I've given up on commenting and will stick to lurking going forward. As a Bernie supporter who migrated to Portland, OR after Trump won the election in 2016, it feels incredibly weird to be called an Alt-Right or Russian agitator simply for pointing out flaws in the current administration.

[–] CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think you might be spending too much time in echo chambers if you think Biden's position on Palestine is what would cost him an election. Most people just do not care enough about this either way to let it affect their vote, regardless of how you and I feel about it.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You don't need a lot of people to care. Just enough to swing the election.

[–] CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Swing the election? Do you mean you'd vote for Trump who has a worse opinion on Palestine? I'm not sure I follow.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn't vote for Trump. And I don't think that the danger comes from people voting for Trump instead of Biden. I think it comes from people not voting at all. Supporting Israel depresses turnout, especially with young people.

[–] CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Ok this makes more sense. Still I just don't see it being the thing that depresses turnout, it's not even on most people's top 5 issues.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

What makes you say that?

[–] z00s@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Something something satire impossible to distinguish something something

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I think Lemmings are just extra shit at distinguishing it. Even worse than the folks over at Reddit.

It's inspiring

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I suppose an attempt at humor is still technically a joke, even when the writer failed to be even remotely funny.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Why do you need to subscribe to 10 different streaming services? I always thought this was such a dumb take.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think some do it because a lot of the content they want to watch is spread out

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

From my POV those are "power users" nd I find it fair that they pay more than me who watches a couple shows a year and that's it.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago
[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Because the days where if Netflix or Amazon didn't have it, it didn't exist are over. Once the content owners saw how much money there was to be made, they let the streaming licenses expire and built their own platforms instead so they could potentially grab a bigger piece of the pie.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 5 months ago

But do you really need to have immediate access to everything that exists at all times? I only signup for Netflix when I want to watch a certain show, then stop my membership.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think that's part of the joke.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 5 months ago

Maybe it is, but I've seen people argue about this before... Same like people that used to hate on apple releasing a new phone every year.