Asklemmy

43962 readers

1327 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

229

Professional Scientists of Lemmy: What is your field of study's, most complex unanswered question? (lemmy.world)

submitted 6 months ago by TehBamski@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

110 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

We still don’t understand quite how the brain works or how consciousness comes from neurons.

[–] dizzy@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Super interesting! I watched an explainer last night about a theory that consciousness arises from space-time collapse quantum wave functions in microtubules.

The vast majority went straight over my head but the host stated that the theory was seen as completely insane by their peers and just recently it’s gaining credibility because of some new research in the past few weeks.

Any thoughts on this?

[–] YIj54yALOJxEsY20eU@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like they really don't want their lives to be deterministic. I'm skeptical of anyone who jumps to quantum mechanics to explain consciousness. Would love to know what research you are referencing.

[–] dizzy@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

This is the youtube video I watched. Here's a link to the recent paper.

[–] YIj54yALOJxEsY20eU@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

Thanks! Very interesting. Looks like we have some quantum activity going on after all. Though, there is a large chasm between observing activity and proving its necessity for our consciousness.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 6 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

This

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] Hobo@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orchestrated_objective_reduction

Is this theory what you're referring to? Just curious because it always seemed interesting to me but I'm not educated enough to even know how to approach the subject beyond going, "huh neat."

[–] YIj54yALOJxEsY20eU@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Ahh jeez the Penrose theory. This theory gets less neat the more you learn about it.

[–] dizzy@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yep that's the theory but the recent paper is this one. This is the youtube video I watched.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 2 points 6 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

This

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.