this post was submitted on 11 May 2024
637 points (96.2% liked)

Games

32528 readers
785 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hswolf@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

thats was just a loud minority talking about super max setting with Raytracing and 4k

[–] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Weren't they specifically advertising for that? The criticism is valid if they were.

[–] hswolf@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Not that I remember, true that it didn't handle the last gen consoles, and that it was marketed as quite demanding

Sadly "minimum" or "recommended" just tells us the game runs, not that it runs well

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Recommended is absolutely meant to be "the game runs well on this" not just it runs

[–] hswolf@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

The thing is what is the consensus of "runs well"? Is it a FPS constant? No glitches? Fast loads?

My point is, a game can come shitty and run a constant 30 fps under the "recommended" since that's what they thought was appropriate

Is a gray area that should be more descriptive, not sure why downvote me

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 1 points 6 months ago

I had a decent AMD card which ran it very well, but still had a bunch of artifacts like Judy's head blocking reflections for the whole lake.