this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2024
13 points (76.0% liked)
Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related
2297 readers
227 users here now
Health: physical and mental, individual and public.
Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.
See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.
Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.
Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you're not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.
Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.
Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I literally avoid "non-GMO" labeled food. Tell me your product doesn't have addictive additives and that you don't sue farmers for unwhittingly sowing seeds fertilized by patented crap in an adjacent field. Oh, and that your seed doesn't grow sterile plants, causing farmers to have to buy from you season after season.
All but the addiction thing, to my knowlege, are real, ongoing problems with certain(maybe all/most?) GMO products, but no, enter the crunchy fad-cycle to periodically remind us of un-proven health issues from products that were developed to make healthier(for you and I) crops that can grow in food-scarce climates.
Might as well say you prefer poor people starve if you care only about non-existant "health issues", and not the predatory practices of certain GMO companies.
Seriously, the health thing has been pushed by GMO companies themselves. They created an easy straw man to debunk so that they don’t have to address the actual issues that GMO products, which are much more sinister to me.
Controlling food production in such a draconian way should send you straight to jail, forever.
GMO companies are not in the business of claiming that GMOs are harmful to your health, and their claims that "this modified crop has more Vitamin A", etc, are both specific and substantiated.
I don't get your take on my original comment at all. Anti-GMO "health" bs is right up there with anti-vax and anti-nuclear power bullshit.
No, that’s not what I was saying. I’m saying it’s the popular talking point because it’s the ones GMO companies like Monsanto often choose to address in PR moves because it’s easy to debunk.
Reread what I said, I’m not saying GMOs are bad for you. I’m agreeing with you. I’m saying it’s all the other things you mentioned that are the real reason these companies deserve to be scrutinized.