this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2024
153 points (83.4% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3743 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 27 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I guess the economy really is doing great. Which is somehow worse, because if this is what a good economy looks like I don't want to imagine what a bad one looks like.

Two thirds of people can't handle a $500 expense. Three quarters don't have a month of expenses saved. And a third of people making over $100,000 a year are living paycheck to paycheck. (Source 2023)

So maybe the problem isn't that the economy is broken and needs fixed, but that it's working correctly and needs replaced.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world -2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I think the problem is lemmy is so privileged that none of you have ever known any actual poor people, which is the group benefiting most from Bidens economy. The middle class (which is what all you people are, no you're not "working class", that's not a thing, you're middle class) is about the same. The upper class is slightly worse off, but they started so far ahead it's difficult to tell that without looking at the stats.

[–] iheartneopets@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Oh please, do get off your high horse. My entire family is poor as shit and everyone is struggling. Also, "upper", "middle", "lower", all just words meant to divide this working class you disavow against itself against the capitalist class.

If you work to earn your living instead of letting your investments do it for you, you're working class.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world -2 points 7 months ago

Exactly, so the single mom struggling on $12k/yr and the corporate executive making $5 million/yr are both "working class". It's such a broad category it's useless, except to provide cover for people making a lot of money who want to pretend they're poor.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

no you're not "working class"

Please explain this to my boss.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

Easy:

Dear Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod's boss. There is no such thing as "working class". It's a useless distinction. Thank you.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe -3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

maybe i am dumb so please help me out here but

35% of people making more than $100k per year are living paycheck to paycheck

how is this an indication of a significant struggle? $100k is a shit ton of money, no? that’s the fabled six figures? and that includes people making more? could not “living paycheck to paycheck” be chalked up to maxing out IRAs and 401ks followed by a decent chunk of using disposable income?

edit thanks 4 the downvotes to my genuine question you guys are truly amazing 😻😇😎 my time on this website is better because of you ✨💫🤩

[–] soEZ@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Because many ppl that earn that kind of cash live in high col area...where ur expenses eat up everything unless u are dual income. In bay area u pay 3k a month for an apartment...and food/gas bills easely add up to 2k....its rough...

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

thanks for the response this makes a lot of sense

i guess my mind cannot comprehend the finances of someone making more than i’ll ever hope to see 😭 so i have a hard time feeling bad for that population segment but maybe that’s something i should self reflect on

[–] CmndrShrm@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It's one of those things where the money sounds good until you realize you also have to live somewhere expensive to get it.

I could conceivably move to somewhere like ND and save a ton of money on housing and the necessities, but the limited job market could also mean that I would be unable to continue in the same career.

And switching jobs sound great, unless you're in an industry seeing large changes post-pandemic. It's certainly kept me from jumping ship. At least until I see my area of work stabilize.

To add to it, I am doing alright overall. But my student loans kicked back in, food prices have climbed, even my monthly utilities have increased as of a few months ago. So I might not be worried about keeping the lights on, I do feel the pinch and it doesn't make me feel overjoyed about the economy.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I live in San Francisco. Things are so expensive here $100k/yr is considered "low income" and qualifies you for government assistance programs.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 1 points 7 months ago

WOW

yep i am seeing the point here, thank you! 😊

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Once you get that fabled six figures you start doing things like getting married, buying a house, and starting a family. Child care is expensive. Health care for children is expensive. Houses are expensive, especially maintenance.

If someone has a family of four and is making $100,000 a year I can definitely see them living paycheck to paycheck.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 2 points 7 months ago

my opinion has already been swayed by other comments but this is not one of them, sorry haha

i know many people with families, children, and houses who make less than half of six figures, who may never hope to get six figures

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I also think it’s not as good an income as you expect. While every place has a range of incomes, in general, you’ll get six figure incomes in high cost of living areas. Sure it’s a higher income, sure it’s probably better but after accounting for how much extra everything costs, it’s not that much better

Where I live, plenty of people are making six figures, but the cheapest single family home will be well over $500k and even older run down houses are approaching $1M. Combine that with higher interest and my point is that $100k income may sound like a lot to many of you, that income level is common here but you can’t buy a house on it. Given how expensive cars are, you probably aren’t driving a new car. You’re probably not buying the latest electronics. You’re probably not going out to eat very often. You’re not hiring a house keeper or yard guy. And if you do any of these, you no longer have disposable income. It may be well over median income but you’re not getting any of the trappings of “well off”