this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2024
658 points (92.2% liked)

News

23268 readers
2906 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Shuttering of New York facility raises awkward climate crisis questions as gas – not renewables – fills gap in power generation

When New York’s deteriorating and unloved Indian Point nuclear plant finally shuttered in 2021, its demise was met with delight from environmentalists who had long demanded it be scrapped.

But there has been a sting in the tail – since the closure, New York’s greenhouse gas emissions have gone up.

Castigated for its impact upon the surrounding environment and feared for its potential to unleash disaster close to the heart of New York City, Indian Point nevertheless supplied a large chunk of the state’s carbon-free electricity.

Since the plant’s closure, it has been gas, rather then clean energy such as solar and wind, that has filled the void, leaving New York City in the embarrassing situation of seeing its planet-heating emissions jump in recent years to the point its power grid is now dirtier than Texas’s, as well as the US average.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, article just offhand mentions that radioactive material was leaking into the river...

That means there was multiple ongoing leaks between multiple systems that need to be completely separate for safe operation.

If the stacks were still good, they should have replaced the reactor. But if those leaks were ongoing and either weren't addressed or couldn't be fixed, then it's incredibly doubtful any maintenance was being done.

Any nuclear plant that's leaking radioactive material needs shut down till it's repaired.

And this one was just in such bad shape it couldn't be repaired.

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Everything can be repaired. It just stops being cost effective at a certain point to do so.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

A leaky containment unit isn't a hole in a bike tire, you can't just get it patched.

And to get a new one in, you're going to have to be ripping out other systems and literally knocking down walls.

By "replace the reactor". I meant containment and primary systems. Secondary system probably didn't have major issues because it's basically normal plumbing at that point. But it's so cheap it would be stupid to not replace it as well.

But the carbon downside to nuclear is the carbon release from the concrete stacks (cloud makers). So even if literally everything else needed to be replaced, it still would have been worth it.

If the stacks were fucked, yeah, it's not salvageable.

You'd literally be demolishing everything onsite and then building a new one. That's not even ship of Thesius level "repair". Everything would be removed and then you'd start fresh.

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Indian Point was water cooled, hence the river water leakage and heating concerns. Water cooled plants don't have those huge stacks you're talking about. Those only exist on air cooled plants.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago

You're right.

I saw the giant concrete enclosure in the pic and my brain just saw it as a stack.

So yeah, to get the actual containment unit replaced, everything would have to be destroyed and replaced.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today -3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, article just offhand mentions that radioactive material was leaking into the river…

Aww man, you were so close to having it figured out. It mentioned that in an off handed way because it left you, the reader, with an impression of what was happening without having to get into the details. Why would they do that? Because said details don't line up with what you've been talking about.

If we look at the NY RiverKeepers website, a source biased towards getting rid of this plant, we find this article: https://www.riverkeeper.org/campaigns/stop-polluters/indian-point/radioactive-waste/radiological-leaks-at-indian-point/

In there is a leak to the radiological events since the plant opened: https://www.riverkeeper.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Indian-Point-Radioactive-Leaks-Sheet.pdf

Oh. No leaking reactors, no leaking primary or secondary cooling systems...most of the problem was with their holding ponds and there were some valve failures.

Now none of that is good but it's a FAR cry from the "leaking reactor" narrative that you seem to have.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

https://www.nytimes.com/2000/08/10/nyregion/con-ed-to-replace-all-generators-at-indian-point-2-plant.html

It's paywalled, but that's what the wiki point to.

If radioactive primary go to SSTG's then it got to the discharge.

They also had an incident where they intentionally vented radioactive steam to atmosphere, but then a valve got stuck and it took them two days to notice.

That plant was a shit show and had been for decades.

But when you act like you're acting, most people won't invest too much time helping you.