this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2024
764 points (96.7% liked)

Curated Tumblr

3854 readers
365 users here now

For preserving the least toxic and most culturally relevant Tumblr heritage posts.

Image descriptions and plain text captions of written content are expected of all screenshots. Here are some image text extractors (I looked these up quick and will gladly take FOSS recommendations):

-web

-iOS

-android

Please begin copied raw text posts (lacking a screenshot that makes it apparent it is from Tumblr) with:

# This has been reposted here to Lemmy as part of the "Curated Tumblr Project."

I made the icon using multiple creative commons svg resources, the banner is this.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

I feel like with all the writers and grammar Nazis there, this problem is actually very minor on Tumblr compared to the rest of the internet.

[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 23 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Strong grammar skills isn't the same as comprehending, though. Being able to write, being able to write well--is also not the same as comprehending what someone else has written. Let alone what someone means by what they've written.

"thatguyfromthatwebsite" seems to have read and interpreted the language properties of the greentext, but was not able to comprehend it, not able to take one single step beyond the text to what the author intends it to mean.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Most of the posts that come across my feed there are lengthy analysis of writing that show they understand it and also have critical thinking skills; which is why I say that.

[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I'm sure that your observation is true, you've probably self-selected critical thinking people and not a random sample.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Maybe. I don't know how their algorithms work. I only follow 2 people: Puchiko and P.M. Seymour and I hardly actually see them on Tumblr itself 🤷🏻‍♂️

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There's an easy experiment I've accidentally run.

Find a thread with a consensus emotion. For example, say that something is a scam, so you have outrage, mistrust, and scepticism.

Take some words from the opposite emotion, calm, trust, believe. Use them to make a point that agrees with the consensus. Watch the downvotes roll in.

People will focus on the emotions from the individual words and not think at all about their meaning as a whole.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Here's one at -2 that's all facts, but doesn't agree with the sentiment of the thread.

https://lemmy.world/comment/7823893

I'm clearly not a fan of Spez (I'm here, aren't I?), but people constantly exaggerate the editing incident.

The fact is that he took a bunch of comments that said "fuck u/Spez" and made them say fuck [the commenter].

That's a problem because it demonstrates what could happen with more subtle edits. It creates reliability issues. But those more subtle edits aren't what actually happened. People constantly take the potential for harmful abuse and act like the harmful abuse actually happened.

[–] skulblaka@startrek.website 3 points 7 months ago

Counterpoint: the potential for harmful abuse from a source that has proven itself willing and capable of it, can in itself be harmful abuse. With that action Spez pointed out "your reality is mine. I can make you say anything I want and there's nothing you can do about it." So, then, people stopped saying things, one of the contributing factors to which was the fact that Spez could just sockpuppet your account whenever he wanted, to say anything at all.

That sounds like an abusive relationship to me. It creates reliability issues like you said, it breaks the bond of trust, and that won't be restored. The damage is done at this point regardless whether he ever took it farther than the initial threat.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

I mean a comment that does this

Take some words from the opposite emotion, calm, trust, believe. Use them to make a point that agrees with the consensus. Watch the downvotes roll in.

I'm just not quite understanding what you mean. It doesn't have to be a real comment.

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 7 months ago (3 children)

YMMV, but I've had more issues with people being this obtuse here on Lemmy than I've ever seen on Tumblr.

Plus, Tumblr is basically all queer content creators who have been on the site for 10-14 years. Subtext is like oxygen to them at this point.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago

It's like some people want to read things in the most obscure way possible.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Lemmy is absolutely the worst I've ever seen with failure to comprehend basic things, and then also getting angry about it.

[–] Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 7 months ago

Lemmy.world has an insane bot problem atm