this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2024
529 points (99.1% liked)
Games
32591 readers
1235 users here now
Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.
Weekly Threads:
Rules:
-
Submissions have to be related to games
-
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
-
No excessive self-promotion
-
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
-
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
-
No linking to piracy
More information about the community rules can be found here.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Does that mean they get more privileges to make crappy predatory games with loot boxes?
QAs don't make nor design games, they test them.
If they test them, how can they approve crappy games?
Maybe you should read how software is developed, what roles there are, how business functions in general, and so on - all that before blaming anyone for anything on the internet.
I make crappy corporate software. I know how this garbage is made and it has no quality. It's all release after release and hope the bugs get fixed after a while by the team.
You're trying so hard to do some edgy pessimistic thing and it's pretty funny how bad you're failing.
thanks, i make an effort to be a good internet organic bot.
Just because they failed QA doesn't mean they failed marketing or won't be released anyways. That's the big wigs forcing shit through.