this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2024
421 points (95.7% liked)

Showerthoughts

29643 readers
900 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The best ones are thoughts that many people can relate to and they find something funny or interesting in regular stuff.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics (NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out)
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] superfes@lemmy.world 125 points 8 months ago (4 children)

I use these all the time, my kids say "just tell me what time it is."

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 73 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Seriously, though. It takes less brain processing power and just about the same speech-time to just say the dang time.

[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 48 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

If your brain works in digital time, this is true.

Us olds have to translate the other direction.

It’s like hearing someone say “why doesn’t everyone just speak English? Why go through the extra effort of speaking Spanish?” because you assume everyone’s internal monologue is in English.

[–] irish_link@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (3 children)

What do you mean if your brain works in digital time. This doesn’t translate for me and I grew up with regular clocks and wrist watches. All time is the same. A clock with both hands facing 12 is and always has been twelve o’clock. Clock face or digital clock. They give the same time. Comparing two devices that give the same information in different ways to language is absurd.

Your comparison could work if the subject being discussed was 12 vs 24 hour time keeping. Then there is a translation between the two.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 18 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Analog clocks lend themselves better to thinking in fractions of an hour or day, like this post is talking about, as an hour and a half day are both represented as a circle

Digital clocks lend themselves better to thinking in terms of number of minutes and hours directly. When working numerically, fractions of 60 are generally less intuitive, and fractions of 12 often so as well. Most people who don't work with angles often think of fractions in terms of percent, or powers of two.

"Quarter past" kind of tweaks the brain wrong when a quarter is intuitively 25.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (3 children)

fractions of 12 are unintuitive

Really? I've always found them very pleasing.

[–] MadBob@feddit.nl 10 points 8 months ago

They chose 12 precisely because it's easy to divide!

[–] thistledown@rblind.com 5 points 8 months ago

I wish our numeric system was base 12 instead of base 10!

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You're on Lemmy, of course you like fractions of 12. It is a very convenient base, having so many factors, but most people don't think like that

[–] key@lemmy.keychat.org 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

That might be the most obscure stereotype I've ever read. 😆

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

It’s also precision. I think this is the biggest thing we’ve lost is some expression of precision.

  • 11:45 from a digital clock is very precise. You expect something at exactly that time, and get more impatient with vagaries of traffic or delays or clocks that aren’t synched, or just that people aren’t digital
  • “quarter of” implies less precision. If I have to wait five minutes, you’re still not late. Regular human activity in the real world is not exact so allowing for inaccuracy is both less stressful and more practical
[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago

Actually a digital clock with both hands pointing at twelve is not a digital clock.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

oh i think this may be a cultural thing, here in europe when we say "digital time" we specifically mean 24-hour time because "AM/PM" isn't used here.

It's the difference between saying "dinner's at seven" and "lunch ends at 13:30"

[–] irish_link@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Ahhh!!! That totally makes sense. I took the comment to be about digital clocks specifically vs analog clocks. Not about the type of time keeping. Then the translation analogy totally makes sense and works! Gotta love learning new things from people. Thanks Swedneck!

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

When people report the time they aren’t reporting their internal dialogue they’re reading what it says on the display. What it says on the display is “four twenty three” not “halfway between quarter and half past four”.

[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

OP didn’t say anything about reading time off a digital clock.

What about the opposite scenario of reporting the time you read off an analog clock? Would you translate to digital first?

In your specific scenario, sure, it would require extra work to convert it, so I’d just read it as is.

But when making plans, and especially spans between two different times, my brain thinks of time as portions of a pie chart, and I’d have to translate 3/4 to 45 minutes.

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It's inefficient is what I'm suggesting.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 23 points 8 months ago (3 children)

It is a one syllable difference, at most. Fif-teen versus Quar-ter-Past. Or Thir-ty versus Half-past. And for-ty-five versus quar-ter-till.

But it is also about precision. If I say "Let's meet up at 4:45" that implies a lot more specificity than "let's meet at quarter to five". The firmer is an exact time people should meet at and the latter is "around that time".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NeopkvAP-ag goes into the difference between analog and digital time and what that means with thought processes. But a lot of it boils down to thinking in terms of "parts of a whole" versus "specific times".

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

it's not like people generally pronounce it fully anyways, it'll come out as "qua'tr" or "quartah" depending on dialect

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 months ago

All of which is still two syllables?

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 8 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://www.piped.video/watch?v=NeopkvAP-ag

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] joel_feila@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm curious why it got the name digital time.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 2 points 8 months ago

Because it is expressed as digits (numbers)

[–] rockerface@lemm.ee 7 points 8 months ago

The most inefficient part of human brain is having to consciously process things. So going with whatever patterns you're used to is always going to be faster

[–] warm@kbin.earth 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

I think there's bigger problems if you have to process the time. If you've never heard it in your life, maybe you'd stop and think, but it's honestly just something you learn and know, no thinking required.

It's like when people don't know 24 hour time, when it's something you've just grown up with, there's no thinking and then you are confused when you hear people have to think about it or "calculate".

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 8 months ago (4 children)

24 hr time should be the global standard too, IMO. Reduce all possibilities of confusion, I say.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

To be honest, it's mainly just USA that just use 12-hour (and call 24-hour "military time"?), the large majority of the world use both interchangeably.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Also adopt UTC as global time while we're improving things. No more messing around with all those different time zones, one is enough.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If we're doing this I'm referring to the hour past midnight as 0:XX and not 24:XX and you can't stop me

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

Maybe I'm missing the joke, but I'm pretty sure 00:XX is correct.

Please do not judge me too harshly if I'm wooshing.

[–] joel_feila@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

so would just saying am pm all the time.

[–] rockerface@lemm.ee 7 points 8 months ago

I have a friend that had issues telling time with analogue clocks when we studied together in a university. It really is just the matter of what you grew up with.

[–] superfes@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

My kids also hate that all my devices use 24 hour time >_>

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

I've been using 24 hour time for the past few years and I still have trouble with it from time to time and have to calculate it in my head.

Also, a different example of something similar is how old I am. Despite knowing my birth year, I still struggle recalling how old I am I still have to take a moment to calculate it.

[–] pimento64@sopuli.xyz 39 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I did the same thing with my parents, mostly because they'd just say "quarter after" but would never say any number. If you made a word cloud of everything I've ever said in my life, "after what" would be gigantic in the center with every other word tiny around the edges.

[–] MIDItheKID@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

This just triggered a deep memory from within me. My brother used to say "half past" when I asked him the time, and when I would say "half past what?" the response was always "Half past the monkeys ass, a quarter to his balls"

I still don't know what it means or where it came from, but when I was 8 years old, it was hilarious.

[–] PoopingCough@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Even worse than that imo is 'quarter of'. I swear to god it's been used to mean both before or after whatever hour they're talking about

[–] Willy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 months ago

mfrs think I know what hours its close to when I probably don't know the day and am lucky to know what month it is.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Anyone using "quarter of" to mean X:15 is just incorrect. That's "quarter after".

[–] John_McMurray@lemmy.world -2 points 8 months ago (3 children)

When you say quarter of, you are supposed to say the next hour. Quarter after 4 is a quarter of 5.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

That's... I guess that makes sense but that's really weird and ambiguous.

[–] bobagem@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Quarter after four is 4:15.

Quarter of five is 4:45. Also quarter to five and quarter til five.

I'm seeing other comments that suggest I might be wrong. Especially in regards to other languages.

[–] thistledown@rblind.com 1 points 8 months ago

I would not have guessed that meaning of "of." I think we should stick to "til" or "past" for clarity.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago
[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 4 points 8 months ago

"It's a third past the hour, ya dang kids!"

[–] John_McMurray@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago

You're failing at your most important job.