this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
39 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
37603 readers
431 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Okay, the responses here are kinda disappointing because folks here seem to be unaware that (1) Mozilla has already added "AI" info Firefox a few versions ago (to provide machine translations of pages), and (2) the way they did it is very responsible (the whole thing is 100% local, no info is sent to other servers).
I understand that we're all tired of this whole trend of language models being put where they don't belong, but from what I see, Mozilla is actually the company I'd trust the most to do it right. (AFAIK, one area where the FOSS world is severely lacking and where Mozilla works to solve it is speech recognition with the Common Voice project, and if they start working on an LLM-based program to do that, I'd welcome it.)
I wish I shared your confidence. Mozilla jumped on the VR hype, then the Metaverse hype and now they're specifically betting on generative AI. It's leaving me feeling as suspicious as the article's author about Mozilla's latest ventures.
If it is totally local, (and able to be disabled easily) then great.
Do it right? Do what right? Stop making a browser?