this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
1097 points (98.7% liked)

Work Reform

9976 readers
91 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Earlier in the pandemic many news and magazine organizations would proudly write about how working from home always actually can lead to over working and being too "productive". I am yet to collect some evidence on it but I think we remember a good amount about this.

Now after a bunch of companies want their remote workers back at the office, every one of those companies are being almost propaganda machines which do not cite sound scientific studies but cite each other and interviews with higher ups in top companies that "remote workers are less productive". This is further cementing the general public's opinion on this matter.

And research that shows the opposite is buried deep within any search results.

Have you noticed this? Please share what you have observed. I'm going paranoid about this.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 108 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I don't care if remote workers are less productive (although I've seen no evidence that they are).

You can't convince me that spending an hour every morning travelling to get to an office, in order to sit in front of the exact two screens I have at home, is a good use of my time, nor is spending an hour getting home again.

That's about 450 hours a year for me. 18 whole days. Those days are mine now, and you're not having them back.

[–] kogasa@programming.dev 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wish I had the same setup at work as at home. My home dev environment cost 5 times as much.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Yeah when I was originally told I could just work from home forever I invested in a giant monitor and all kinds of tools. Now they changed their mind and want me to go in to an Office with shared desks. No thanks

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Ackshually, they're two distinct sets of two screens. Unless you're taking your two monitors to work and back home every day.

(sorry for the pedantry I'm ashamed)

[–] Octavio@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If we wanted to take the pedantry to the next level, we could get into a metaphysical discussion about whether the word “screen” refers to the physical appliance displaying the content or the content itself. When you “share your screen” in a Teams meeting, you don’t box up your monitor and mail it to your coworkers. 🤔

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

I do, am I doing it wrong...?

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

You are technically correct, the best kind of correct.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

I have at home, is a good use of my time, nor is spending an hour getting home again.

Yeah, but those are YOUR hours and THEY don't pay for it, so those hours don't matter. In fact, it'd be better if you don't get those hours to yourself. Maybe you'll have more time to apply to other jobs or something.

[–] solstice@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What about 2-3 days a week and an extra week or two of PTO to compensate? I'm trying to think of ways to incentivize more office work that will appeal to stingy boomer leadership and the younger 'fuck offices' crowd.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I think the only deal I'd take to return to the office every day is a 4 day week. If I have to commute, I also want 4 weeks off.

[–] spuncertv@iusearchlinux.fyi 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's nice to have less traffic for blue collar as well.

[–] Kahlenar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Ah if Hartford CT wasnt a traffic hell