this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
416 points (97.7% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3325 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Stand for America Fund Inc, a super PAC that supports Nikki Haley, reported on Thursday that it has raised $50.1 million in the second half of 2023 — millions more than Trump-aligned super PAC MAGA Inc., which reported over $46 million.

There are no details from these numbers yet, which were reported by the New York Times, as the Federal Election Commission filing deadline is only Jan. 31.

When it comes to MAGA Inc.'s funds, the super PAC ended the year with over $23 million in cash on hand, according to reports — and counted with over a dozen donors who contributed with $1 million or more.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frunch@lemmy.world 47 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Omg imagine if she ends up being the first female president?!? This is just silly, but i do love watching conservative infighting 🍿🥂

[–] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 93 points 7 months ago (5 children)

It reminds me of the interview that Jordon Klepper did with MAGA voters in 2016.

MAGA woman: A woman can't be president! If she has a hot flash or gets emotional, she could start a war!

Jordon: Haven't all wars been started by men?

MAGA woman: pause

[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 34 points 7 months ago (6 children)

I cannot wrap my brain around the mental path that leads any woman to support Donald Trump.

Like...why? What on earth does this candidate offer you?

[–] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I know a woman that is a trump supporter. She is also a christian evangelical and has been most of her life.

I think the reason she is a trump supporter is that her christian education has taught her that there is a hierarchy to reality.

That men are the protectors - God (a man in her world view) is the head of that

Women are the providers and submissive to men.

I think the bravado of trump appeals to her sense of reality, A strong "protector" man in charge. All of his limitations are not for her to question because she is the provider not the questioner.

[–] SimplyTadpole@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 7 months ago

Trust me, there is a seriously disturbing amount of genuinely misogynistic women out there. I've had the misfortune of dealing with them many times...

[–] rigamarole@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

I asked my mother, so I can answer. She said if he is the Republican nominee, she will vote for him. Extended reasoning is "not a Democrat".

[–] tty5@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

It's not about what people who vote from him will get, it's what he promises to take away from people they don't like.

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Bigotry. Whether they realize it or not.

[–] loutr@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

There's a great scene featuring a Donald Trump speech and a brainwashed MAGA woman in the latest Fargo season.

[–] lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee 10 points 7 months ago

As a woman in my 40s I can't even tell you the number of wars I've started during a hot flash and I'm not even the commander in chief of the largest military in the world. If I were though I would have definitely launched nukes on at least 5 occasions just because I was hot for a few minutes.

/s because jfc

[–] Maco1969@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Queen Boudica went to war with the Romans.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I mean after men raped her and her daughters.

[–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Not to mention: killed her husband in the first fucking place.

[–] Algaroth@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

Women get emotional over the smallest things.

[–] guacupado@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

For anyone who may want to upvote this dummy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boudica

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

That pause was loooong and incredibly awkward. You could practically hear the gears grinding in her head as she tried to reconcile the cognitive dissonance.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

she'd quite frankly be worse than trump. nevermind the fact that she wants a national abortion ban and a national trans care ban

[–] guacupado@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

And that she's trying to tell everyone that slavery was a good thing for black people.

[–] TJDetweiler@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Isn't this stuff Trump also wants?

[–] rigatti@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Trump probably personally doesn't care, but he knows he can say he wants those things to get support from Republicans.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 7 months ago

yeah all republicans are bad but at least trump doesn't try to pretend he's a moderate

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I mean, if it weren't for MAGA, she would trounce Biden in the general.

[–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That's kinda what they're banking on, though...

[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I just can't see it happening from the party of religious patriarchy. These are the sort of folks who excommunicated women for wanting to become priests over a year ago, and that's just the moderate Catholics; Evangelicals would probably burn down the church.

[–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

I wish they fuckin' would, frankly