this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024
1026 points (93.9% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26524 readers
2212 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

EDIT: since apparently a bunch of people woke up with the wrong foot this morning or forgot to check the group they’re in:

This is a joke. Do not steal or vandalize speed enforcement cameras (or anything else for that matter). That’s against the law and you will likely get arrested.

If you’re addicted to crack or any other drugs, please seek professional help.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This one is in a school zone. People really shouldn't be speeding through them unless they're a "fuck them kids" kinda person, and if you are you're a piece of shit.

[–] Iron_Lynx@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (14 children)

Even better solution though: (re-) build the street at a school zone so that no driver more sane than the most insane Florida Man would not fathom driving any faster than 20 km/h, no speed cameras required.

[–] byroon@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Even better solution though: the street at a school zone that no driver more sane than the most insane Florida Man would not fathom driving any faster than 20 km/h, no speed cameras required.

What?

[–] Iron_Lynx@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (15 children)

It's simple. If you design the road to be wide, straight, with wide, clearly marked lanes, clear sides and a smooth surface, people will naturally be inclined to drive faster. This is based on experiences with forgiving design. For motorways, this is fine. But for residential neighbourhoods and school zones, it's a bloodbath waiting to happen.

So out there, you do the exact opposite. Make the street so narrow that anything bigger than an average pickup truck barely fits in a lane. Make it out of brick and don't mark the centre of the road. Surround the street with shrubs and other obstacles, and stick it full of sharp chicanes.

This is the deliberate inverse of forgiving design, called traffic calming.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Make the street so narrow that anything bigger than an average pickup truck barely fits. Make it out of brick and don’t mark the centre of the road.

School buses are a thing.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They used to be. Now everyone drives their kids to school for reasons.

[–] Emerald@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The urban planning in many cities is so absurd and not meant for buses. This means school bus routes are absolute madness and can take hours to get everyone home

[–] Iron_Lynx@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

School busses do nothing to solve the problem of speeding in school zones.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I specifically quoted the part about making the road in front of a school so narrow a pickup truck would have trouble.

If it's too narrow for a pickup truck, how are school busses supposed to function?

[–] Iron_Lynx@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Then let me specify:

Wide enough for one pickup and no opposing traffic, but so narrow that two pickups are going to really have to negotiate to move around each other.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Schools have more than one bus and they have to pass each other. There are also school buses for the other nearby schools like the middle school and high school running at the same time even when school starts times are offset.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Schools have more than one bus and they have to pass each other.

No they don't they can enter from the same side. You're just looking for excuses. Also why do you need buses in the first place why aren't the kids walking or biking.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You have one bus going in one direction to a school passing another bus going to another school.

Have you only lived in an inner city where roads can be one way because they alternate in direction every block?

Also why do you need buses in the first place why aren’t the kids walking or biking.

???? If that's your solution then why is there a road to begin with? Just ban cars. Simple.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You have one bus going in one direction to a school passing another bus going to another school.

In front of a school? Are your schools connected directly to highways or something?

Have you only lived in an inner city where roads can be one way because they alternate in direction every block?

We don't have blocks.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Are your schools connected directly to highways or something?

Roads are typically 2 lanes one in each direction. You already know this because you said a solution would be to remove the lane marker.

So you have a road with an elementary school, and 2 miles further down is a middle school. Even without that you have buses passing each other during pickup because busses only pickup kids on one side of the street so you don't have young kids crossing roads. So one bus runs in one direction down a road picking up kids direction down the road.

We don’t have blocks.

What do you call a section of inner city bounded on all sides by a road in your country?

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Roads are typically 2 lanes one in each direction. You already know this because you said a solution would be to remove the lane marker.

I'm someone else.

So you have a road with an elementary school, and 2 miles further down is a middle school. Even without that you have buses passing each other during pickup because busses only pickup kids on one side of the street so you don’t have young kids crossing roads.

Lots of questions here: Why can't kids walk 500m to the next bus stop? Why are streets so unsafe so that kids can't cross them?

Why assume that there's no larger road in between those smaller roads? Roads generally form a hierarchy, you have big ones feeding into middle ones feeding into small ones. Small ones should absolutely be safe to cross, also without explicit crossings, because they're traffic calmed and don't have much traffic in the first place. That's where houses and schools are, where there's no through-traffic because even if they aren't cul de sacs who would drive through a road you can't drive fast on when there's a mid-level road that you could take.

What do you call a section of inner city bounded on all sides by a road in your country?

Straßenblock. Let me put it differently: We don't have grids and nothing is regular. This is about as grid-y as it gets and if you zoom in you'll notice that the interior streets have no lane markers and some even are cobbled. Those connect to a street ( south, Hallerstraße) with bike lanes (don't need those on smaller streets because there's not enough traffic to warrant them), which connects to a four-lane (plus bus lane) street, Grindelalle, west. The intersection looks a bit crazy but it's actually safe for pedestrians and you should've learned how to cross streets safely and what traffic lights are in Kindergarten. You've also been there with your parents (going shopping or whatever) a lot of times, nothing scary really. That kind of density and housing is probably illegal to build where you are (it's illegal pretty much everywhere in the US and Canada).

And mind you Hamburg is awful when it comes to urbanism, way too car-centric. Not because of lack of public transport but because politicians are unwilling to kill off car traffic and the whole city is full of rich fucks with too much disposable income.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (12 children)

Why can’t kids walk 500m to the next bus stop? Why are streets so unsafe so that kids can’t cross them?

I suggested banning cars.

"We don't have blocks"

Straßenblock

THAT TRANSLATES TO STREET BLOCK!

A block in the US doesn't mean a square either.

I already suggested, "Just ban cars. Easy."

It is required that children do not cross two lane roads to be picked up by school buses. I don't make the rules. I don't have a solution to US car culture. But making roads unpassable by school buses isn't an answer.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

My elementary school was 15 miles from my house. You think that's a safe distance for a 6 year old to travel alone?

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Let me look at a map... maybe 1km max anywhere in my 30k town to the next primary school and that's when you're living on the very very edge of town. Should be under 500m for most pupils.

If you're living in a rural area, outside of the next village (which will have a school), which is an absolute exception as things tend to cluster into villages in rural areas, it might be 5km. Not really an issue with a bike, I biked what 3.5km to Kindergarten (together with my mom). If you have less density than that you probably should have boarding schools.

For secondary education, if you're living in a village you'll probably have to take the bus to the nearest city. Regular public transport though the schedule will take school times into account. Yes, kids can walk 500m to the nearest station.

Bonus: All that school density -- smaller but way more of them -- means that there's obvious places to hold elections as there's a municipality-owned place in Sunday stroll distance to pretty much everywhere. The only downside are the ludicrously low tables.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago
[–] damnyouclouds@sopuli.xyz 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] psud@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

My city has exactly one road designed like this. Fire trucks have no problem

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I really want to see these cities. They have a dedicated grid of streets for cyclists, a different grid for fire trucks, a different grid for pedestrians, and a Kafkaesque nightmare of curves for cars. Cars that presumably often break down and the drivers are found later fleshless with teeth marks on their bones. Somehow 4 seperate roadway structures are imposed on a single city.

[–] psud@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I wish my suburb's streets were rebuilt to pedestrian/cyclist friendly style. It would be easy as every street has very easy access to the 80km/h square of main roads that surround it

You could block every street in the suburb in its middle and force all drivers to take the shortest path to a fast road, and let bikes and walkers take the short paths within the suburbs.

My street has about 2000 cars a day, with over 90% of them using it as a short path between two fast roads, or accessing or leaving a destination in a different part of the same suburb.

A friend lives in a suburb that's a tree structure, that's about a third best as there are no destinations from the "trunk" roads to anything but destinations within the suburbs. I'd hate to see that suburb needing to be evacuated quickly, but they're deep in suburbia and on a hill, so safe from fire and flood

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I wish mine was as well. Just a nice straightforward grid. Minimize the time it takes to get anywhere by any means. Makes navigation easier as well.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago

Not an issue in Europe. Though granted the US would probably need to replace their fire trucks with sanely-sized ones. You also don't need to haul a big-ass ladder in a low-density area what's your plan use it to do a header into a suburban pool.

Regarding response time absence of gridlock will be more important than the last hundred metres on a residential street, consider investing in public transportation, walkable cities, and generally everything that abolishes owning and using a car being mandatory.

[–] zakobjoa@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Hey, I live on a road like that. It's not even bricks, but good ol' cobblestone. The cars also share it with a tram.

There's a lot of pedestrians crossing. It's a residential area with shops in the ground floor of all the buildings.

There's multiple schools and kindergartens around, so they set the speed limit to 30km/h. Does that matter? No. People go 50-60 during the day and 70-80 at night. The only times that doesn't happen is when the cops set up a mobile speed camera.

The road is fairly straight, I'll give you that, but I guess they can't just demolish a few kilometres of 100yrs old houses to make to road a bit winding.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 8 points 9 months ago (3 children)
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 3 points 9 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

Relevant Not Just Bikes

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)