this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
584 points (87.8% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35735 readers
1958 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 81 points 11 months ago (6 children)

Flip it around - why would you work a job, any job, where you don't know your pay until after the work is done?

"Tipping" is rich-people speak for shifting the expense (and blame) to the customer.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 47 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Tips are no longer tips and companies have successfully forced us to pay their employees for them.

It's not the customer's fault. In addition to us paying their wages we have to trust some rando to do a good job with zero evidence they will.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If they don't fulfill your expectations, you inform DoorDash. They hand out full refunds like candy.

That "rando" is not a DoorDash employee. You're hiring a contractor through a broker, not asking a restaurant to send a waitress to your table.

The employee-waitress can't refuse you service without getting herself fired, but a contractor-driver can tell you exactly where and how far to shove your bullshit offer.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I don't understand what point you're trying to make. I realize they aren't employees. That's the root of the problem. They should be employees and paid by their employer. If they can't run their business that way, then that clearly shows that it's an exploitative and shitty business model that shouldn't exist in the first place.

I do not appreciate Doordash offloading its responsibility of paying and "disciplining" its workers onto customers. Do you honestly have no problem with that?

They hand out refunds like candy.

That is assuming that I have the time and remember to do this, not to mention that I shouldn't have to do it.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's the root of the problem. They should be employees and paid by their employer.

I strongly disagree. Employment is not a mutually beneficial relationship. Employment is an encumbrance on the worker, especially a non-union worker. As an employer, DoorDash can demand exclusivity. DoorDash would be allowed to add a non-compete clause, prohibiting employees from performing courier work on the side, or for competing platforms. I don't want my working hours dictated to me on a schedule. I don't want to have to negotiate time off or finding someone to cover my shift.

Employment would allow them to force drivers to take all "assignments". I like being able to refuse service to a particular vendor or abusive customer. I don't want to be forced to wait in the drive thru line for 45 minutes at a Taco Bell in a high-crime area.

Courier service is menial labor. When I look at other large businesses that utilize menial labor, I am not particularly struck by the equity of their employment agreements. I don't see "employment" working out too well for the workers of Walmart, for example.

I do not appreciate Doordash offloading its responsibility of paying and "disciplining" its workers onto customers. Do you honestly have no problem with that?

No, I don't have a problem with that. I think DoorDash retains too much control over pay and discipline of workers, and interferes too much between customers and workers.

DoorDash punishes workers for refusing orders, by downgrading their priority for higher paying offers. When a customer insists on placing a $3 offer for a 9-mile delivery, every driver in the area will reject it. That single shitty order results in every active driver having their "Acceptance Rate" stat lowered. DoorDash should not be giving customers this particular power over drivers. It is the customer who should be "punished" for making an offer so far below minimum wage.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Wow, what a bad set of takes.

You want Doordash to get the benefits of a company, but not the responsibilities of one. Because: libertarianism, or something

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

You seem to be portraying "libertarianism" as a negative attribute for a worker. I don't concede that at all.

A menial laborer has a sudden, unexpected opportunity fall in his lap. He wins tickets to a baseball game for him and his daughter.

As an employee, he has to weigh the ramifications of going to the game against his obligation to his employer. He has to face their attendance policy. A policy he had no meaningful input in developing, that he can either accept, or lose his job. That policy says he has to be at his station, stacking product on retail shelves, or earn himself a mark toward termination.

As a contractor, he writes his own attendance policy. The only consequence he faces for skipping work is he doesn't get paid.

As an employee, he will likely have to say "Sorry, I can't afford to skip my job stacking boxes on shelves, even for the opportunity to share this game with my kid. Can I get cash value instead?"

As a contractor, turning down the tickets doesn't even begin to enter his thoughts. The time at the game is more valuable to him than the compensation for stacking boxes on shelves, so he turns off his driver app and goes to the game. His "company" doesn't care that he skipped work to go to a game. They just keep dispatching work to the people who show up.

The "employment" model is absolutely terrible for the menial laborer, especially for non-union workers. It gives business entirely too much control over the lives of its workers. It's completely disgusting that we allow major corporations to use this model.

The primary compensation method for most menial labor should be piecework, not hourly. A business needs to set a piecework rate high enough that new, inexperienced workers are willing to perform. Experienced, efficient, and proficient menial laborers who can optimize their production and produce several times the rate of a new worker should be paid several times higher.

Hourly wages should be reserved for skilled jobs, or where the worker is spending a substantial part of their time waiting for processes to finish rather than proceeding at their own pace.

Employer-sponsored healthcare and other essential programs are not "benefits". They are entanglements designed to make it harder for the employee to say "no" to the employer's demands. They aren't benefits; they are extortions.

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 29 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

There's nothing to flip, gratuity and wages should be separate things. And minimum, standard living wages should be paid.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

The point of tipping (to the tipper) is to show appreciation for the quality of service you received. If service is shit, you don't get tipped as much.

Tipping before you get the service means quality of service plays no part in the transaction.

[–] Cornerspace@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

America’s view that tipping is normal needs to change.

How about an adequate wage instead, like the rest of the developed world?

[–] Bonehead@kbin.social 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They already know the pay. If the pay isn't enough without the tip, then maybe they should consider getting a different job.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The pay is about $2 per order, regardless of mileage. Dashers can typically complete 2-3 orders per hour, and pay for their own fuel. The base pay is absolutely not worth it.

[–] Bonehead@kbin.social 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They are paid approximately $4 to $6 per hour, and yet some people are still defending the practice and asking customers to pay extra on top of the food and the $10+ delivery charge...

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Given their compensation model, all I can say is that if you are not willing to tip, and/or you are not willing to tip ahead of time, you absolutely should not use the service at all.

[–] Bonehead@kbin.social 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And I don't, specifically for that exact reason.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today -1 points 11 months ago

Good.

Now, fuck off.