Technology

59457 readers

3512 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

333

Google Will Stop Telling Law Enforcement Which Users Were Near a Crime (finance.yahoo.com)

submitted 11 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

44 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Google Will Stop Telling Law Enforcement Which Users Were Near a Crime::(Bloomberg) -- Alphabet Inc.’s Google is changing its Maps tool so that the company no longer has access to users' individual location histories, cutting off its ability to respond to law enforcement warrants that ask for data on everyone who was in the vicinity of a crime.Most Read from BloombergNetanyahu, Under Pressure Over Hostage Deaths, Vows to Press OnMike Johnson May Be the Next House Speaker to Lose His Job‘Underwater’ Car Loans Signal US Consumers Slammed by High RatesUS Navy Shoots Do

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] glowie@h4x0r.host 57 points 11 months ago (3 children)

There must have been an operational bottleneck with handling the LEOs requests that they decided to prevent the data requested from even existing in order to not be able to reply to such requests. Surely this came down to business and not alturism.

[–] oDDmON@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I doubt operational bottlenecks were the issue, more likely the rising volume of requests made Google reassess the policy.

LEOs already press the boundaries of the permissible, and as much as I hate giving props to the big G, good on Google for taking the initiative.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Cops only investigate people they think are guilty, and despite being objectively terrible at their jobs, they have ridiculous amounts of self confidence.

So to them, if they suspect someone of a crime, they can "bend" any rules for stuff like this because "the suspect is clearly guilty anyways, we just don't have proof".

[–] odelik@lemmy.today 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Wouldn't the inability to process the volume of request from LEOs be an apt example of an operational bottleneck?

[–] oDDmON@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

The article didn’t state that Google had problems responding to LE requests.

Also, Google can have as much capacity as God, whenever they decide to put their will to something.

They also consume data like mortals consume chips, and one bar chart would be all it took for them to address a potential bottleneck, and rising liability, by finally eliminating it.

[–] topinambour_rex@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Or self preservation.