this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
148 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37730 readers
368 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Okay, I was with you in the first half. I live in Australia, there are plenty of places that you need a car. I clearly wasn’t talking about those situations though.

Electric vehicles are a now solution.

In my part of Australia, the grid is powered by burning brown coal. One of, if not the most, dirty form of power generation. We have no plan on how to stop burning it either. So electric vehicles are just going to make things worse.

Electric vehicles as a solution is the exact same brainwashing as recycling making a difference. When the biggest impact would be made by targeting corporate polluters.

Also, seriously, centuries? I forgot that trains were invented in the 1600s and that’s why the midwest finally had them by the late 1800s.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago

Unless you buy the most extravagant and silly EV on the market (the Hummer), EVs are still a win over ICE when powered by coal plants.

And yes, it would be incredibly difficult for these towns to transition to usable public transportation. There are decisions literally set in concrete. You'd have to tear down perfectly good buildings and replace them with higher density housing. The concrete you would need is itself a major CO2 emitter. You could basically let everyone drive ICE cars for an extra decade for the amount of concrete you'd need.

CO2 neutral concrete (or even CO2 negative) is out there, but it's not scaled up enough yet.

Meaning that electric vehicles are something that the average person can do right now to ebb climate change. However if your local power authority hasn't gone green (mine is a combo of hydro, wind, and nuclear) then you should also push them to go green asap.

Please don't call it brainwashing. I've researched the subject from a lot of angles and have come to the conclusion it's the best for me, while I still push our local governments to build out transport. I'm trying to lower my carbon footprint the best I can as an individual.