this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
854 points (96.3% liked)

politics

19088 readers
3572 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] electrogamerman@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

As a non american this just feels like a stunt to promote Trumps election for president.

Edit: For the record I said as a non american cuz I dont know a lot about it. Lets be real, he is not going to prison, he deserves it tho, but he has too much power to go to prison. Only thing happening is his name is now everywhere, so if he was not popular enough already, people are talking more about him now

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So the justice department should have just let Trump get away from it all and then he for sure wouldn't be re-elected?

[–] Toribor@corndog.social 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

There have been a lot of people saying that prosecuting Trump for crimes only helps him and never hurts him. I'm not sure that's true.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Even if it does help him, which I am dubious of, the alternative is to say "Presidents and ex-presidents can get away with doing whatever they want." Is that really the best thing for the country?

[–] oce@jlai.lu 12 points 1 year ago

I think giving up on prosecuting him because it may help him would indicate a far greater forfeiture of USA's democracy.

[–] TechyDad@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

We can't choose to do things or not do things based on "what will the 30% of Americans who are die hard Trump supporters think?" If we did that, we might as well just turn over all power to then and let them make our lives a living hell. (They certainly don't worry about what we think.)

Prosecuting Trump for his crimes is the right thing to do. Nobody is above the law and Trump needs to face justice for his crimes. If he doesn't, we're just begging someone else to do the same thing, but be more successful at it.

[–] scottywh@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

As an American I think that's insane... There are a lot of dumbasses here tho... Fuck that dipshit criminal motherfucker though.

[–] Elderos@lemmings.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

I am curious what mecanism would save him from prison at this point. Power should have shielded him from investigations, the DOJ, the FBI, from the indictments going through, from the grand jury indicting him, but here we are. At this point, people usually end up in prison. What if the jury and judge give prison time, what law or mecanism is gonna prevent it? I mean, we know that he could get a pardon, but that is about it.

[–] TechyDad@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At this point, Trump has about 4 ways to avoid prison, not all of them likely:

First, he could beat all the charges outright. While Judge Cannon might throw the case in Florida, I don't think he could beat every charge and avoid all punishments. One of the problems he's facing with the multiple indictments is that it only takes one sticking to land him in prison for years, if not decades.

Secondly, he could plea out. Like the last option, this is unlikely. Maybe he could reach a deal in one case (though I doubt it without an admission of guilt and prison time), but all 4 (including Georgia)? Highly unlikely.

Third, he could get reelected and pardon himself. This might work for the federal cases, but won't work in the upcoming Georgia case.

Finally, the most realistic option, Trump could be convicted and sentenced, but the reality of security concerns over a former President being in prison keeps him out of an actual cell. Instead, he's stuck in a "cell" on some military base or in Mar-A-Lago which gets taken over and converted into a "prison for one."

For the latter, it would involve nobody else allowed on property who isn't part of security or supporting the "prison." Trump's room would be stripped to the bare walls and a prison cot tossed in the room. He'd spend most of his time in the bare room without TV, a phone, or anything else - only allowed out for meals (prison food, not his usual Mar-A-Lago fare) and maybe an hour of "outside time." So while he technically wouldn't be in prison, he'd be effectively locked up.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If he's convicted and sentenced, he deserves to lose ALL former presidential benefits.

He doesn't respect the position, and thus, all benefits should be stripped from him.

[–] Elderos@lemmings.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I suppose this would need to go through congress to happen. Very unlikely to succeed.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Which, if that happened, means all those who are on his side need to lose their jobs and protections.

No hyperbole: this is a coup, it's ongoing, and we need to cut out the toxicity.

It's like the "this is fine" meme, but some people are actively trying to continue burning down the house. If they can't be stopped from continuing the burn the place down, they need to be escorted out and remove any and all arsonist-related abilities / materials. If they continue even after that, they need to be jailed.

[–] ZMonster@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At this point I wouldn't be surprised if Biden pardoned him, not because it would make any sense at all, but because we live in bizarro-world now and that makes sense there.

[–] Defaced@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

IMO the best case scenario is trump goes to jail and Biden announces he's not running for re-election. Biden not running being symbolic to show it wasn't about winning the election, it was about upholding the rule of law. I know that won't happen because Biden is too proud of himself to do that, but that simple gesture would do a lot to heal this country.

[–] grue@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While I'd like that too, considered in and of itself, the lack of an obvious Democratic front-runner in Biden's absence means I'd worry that would just be ceding the presidency to DeSantis.

[–] Addv4@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the happy middle ground would be Biden rerunning with AOC as his vp. Kamala Harris isn't popular, and that combined wihh Biden not being too popular is a recipe for trouble, that might be somewhat mitigated by having AOC drum up some support. However, I doubt DeSantis has a chance in hell of even getting a modicum of republican support, so I'm not that worried about him.

[–] Elderos@lemmings.world 1 points 1 year ago

trump also hates Desantis, and so do much trumpets. If trump does not run Biden is sure to get reelected.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think what will protect him is when this goes to the supreme court. However they manage to get it there, we'll be at the mercy of the morally corrupt judges there. Whether they decide to pull some 6th century deer shit farming traditions out of their ass to justify their decision or not is what will determine the outcome.

[–] Elderos@lemmings.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don't think this court has ever been sympathetic towards Trump, or even the GOP, in the sense that what they want usually align but they don't really care about Trump. They already rejected the state legislature theory and previous Trump claims. Don't get me wrong, they suck, but their allegiance is not with Trump. They care about OG conservatives values and Christianity values. They're anti liberal, not pro-Trump, if that somehow make sense.

[–] Techmaster@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

They're more like Mitch McConnell, and he obviously hates Trump.

[–] PRUSSIA_x86@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Legally, I don't think anything short of the plea deal of the century could keep him out of prison. Realistically? A mob of his supporters could try and break him out, which based on recent history might not be too far-fetched.

[–] Mlemm@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

The same mechanism that kept OJ out of prison: money.