this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
503 points (96.5% liked)

Privacy

31934 readers
736 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

On the side bar it lists the following:

  • [Matrix/Element]Dead
  • Discord

"Discord" is an active link, but the Matrix link is completely inactive. Not only is it inactive (which could have be excused as a broken link), but it is also manually labeled as "Dead", as if there is no intention of making it work. How can a community that is focused on privacy willingly favor a service that is privacy non-respecting when a perfectly functional privacy-respecting alternative exists?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz 51 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wait, really? So you think Matrix is the ultimate form of secure and private "chat" communities? Because if it is not then it is a compromise.

This Lemmy instance for sure as hell is not the most private and secure.

[–] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 46 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's a lot better than discord, that's for sure

[–] NumbersCanBeFun@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I agree with you. I don’t understand why people are arguing that something less developed or stable is a valid reason to use something like discord, a widely anti privacy focused platform; to discuss privacy related topics.

You can argue that it’s more stable but the cost is shepherding users into a platform they might think is secure by promoting it. In my opinion that’s worse because it lulls uneducated users into a false sense of security by having the community use and engage with each other there. The implication alone might cause some people not to second guess it since it’s supported by the community and that’s a problem for me personally.

[–] AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago

Never used it but I can imagine it being better. Discord is annoying as hell. Point was that the commenter seemed to argue that you should not accept any compromises, which seems silly to me.

[–] thanksforallthefish 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That depends on your threat model. All lemmy posts are publicly visible and can be scooped up by Farcebook, google et al. Discord is very definitely not properly private but all posts aren't public. They are undoubtedly doing the same thing FB does and selling a semi anonymised set of meta data about you, but the world doesn't have direct visibility

I know the three letter acronyms have access to everything I do, hidden or not, I don't like it but I don't see anyway around it.

I can however do my level best to keep FB, google, M$ out of my stuff to some extent

[–] sxan@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They said a "big" compromise? Why did you skip over their qualifier? Are all compromises equal?

[–] null@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] sxan@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I dunno. The comment doesn't have the word in it now; that's why #1981 is important. But, maybe they didn't and I imagined it.

It remains true that not all compromises are equal, and the privacy compromises we make for Discord are relatively large compared to the ones for Matrix.

[–] null@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is an "edited" indicator for posts, and the post you're referring to doesn't have it.

Sure, your point is true, but you were (incorrectly) accusing the other commenter of skipping a qualifier that would make your point relevant.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago

You're right; Voyager doesn't show the "edited" flag.

I was mistaken about the word, and the accusation about skipping over it was unwarrented.

I think this is missing the point by arguing semantics, but my phrasing was wrong.