this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
203 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37716 readers
323 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] laylawashere44@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The guy behind this paper has the exact same issues as Schon. Plagiarism in his PhD thesis, faked data, retracted papers, etc.

[–] ZickZack@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

No he doesn't?
Don't get me wrong there are many places where the paper can be wrong (eg fig 1 or their magnetism exceptionally looking more similar to diamagnetism than superconductivity) but you are mixing him up with Ranga Dias who has had a history of data fabrication.
Dias has nothing to do with this paper though.

[–] keegomatic@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Got a source? When I first read about this people were cautiously optimistic partly because the head researcher was well-respected.

[–] emhl@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Btw. Schön Didn't plagiarize in his PhD thesis, the title was removed because of his other shortcomings