this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2023
53 points (100.0% liked)

Science

12958 readers
96 users here now

Studies, research findings, and interesting tidbits from the ever-expanding scientific world.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I think the best we can hope for if we get very very lucky with future laws of physics is a cheap way to travel near but slightly below lightspeed. Maybe some sort of way to lower the rest mass of matter.

It's much more likely there will be no immediate application of whatever the full laws are, because new physics only appears in very extreme circumstances we can't easily replicate.

[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Maybe some sort of way to lower the rest mass of matter.

Now that you mention it, what if we can create a region of space in which c is greater than normal? Is that possible? Would living things be able to continue living inside it?

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Like some sort of... sub-space?

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Even if so, it doesn't matter how you do it, moving faster than c does bad things to causality. You'd be one Lorentz boost away from a grandfather's paradox. I think that would hold for a region of space with lower c too, weirdly enough, because it itself could also be boosted in a way discordant with everything else.

You could just abandon relativity entirely, I guess, but that's kind of a key ingredient in how the universe works. Making a theory like that, I'd imagine, is like baking chocolate chip cookies without the chips.

[–] Zapp@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I like to think the best we can hope for is that the speed of light limit is somehow naturally localized and the border to that localization is nearby enough for us to discover before we make ourselves extinct.

It's not too likely, since there would probably be solid evidence of it already in the light at can see.

Oh well.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

It’s not too likely, since there would probably be solid evidence of it already in the light at can see.

This. And even if it wasn't, it would have to be far enough away to defeat the point. I think a faster speed of light in the milky way would be very obvious.