this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
69 points (93.7% liked)

Games

32467 readers
1201 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Wolpertinger@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm glad this is the case, but still, exclusivity is bullshit.

[–] BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

seriously, i want to play spider-man without spending a fortune on a ps5 or a computer that can run it

but, i have the old spider-man 2 i can always play on both xbox and ps2

[–] 520@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, the new Spiderman games were made by a Sony studio and funded by Sony, so I can definitely see why those are exclusive.

[–] BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

but spider-man used to not be exclusive

[–] 520@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Spiderman is a licensed property. Marvel sold time-limited video game licenses. The Activision games were never exclusive to any console because Activision had no particular stake in any one console. Then a video game license, a non-exclusive one, mind you (which means that other people can get the license and make games) was granted to Sony, who obviously does.

Thus, for the same reason 007 Goldeneye never came to playstation, Insomniac's Spiderman games aren't coming to Nintendo or Xbox.