this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2025
299 points (99.0% liked)

politics

24728 readers
2644 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 60 points 2 weeks ago

He gave people something to vote for...

It was a stupid hateful thing, but it was a thing his base wanted.

Biden/Kamala didn't, at every opportunity they'd talk about their similarities to trump on things like Palestine, the border, healthcare, fracking, pretty much any question they asked they'd say they mostly agree with trump, but have slight differences.

That was trying to get people to vote against trump due to a slight difference, still voting against trump because the difference made trump worse.

So yeah...

That's the largest reason trump is president again.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes? What makes you think otherwise?

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It's just crazy people wanted that

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Everyone knows that the current system is broken. Trunp has been saying that he will tear the system down while the Dems have been going on about how everything is actually great. People don't care what the change is, they just want something different.

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yea but the left also does the same. They don't say everything is going great. But they do exactly the same thing they did last time they said everything was terrible. Therefore they must think what they do works pretty well otherwise you'd think they'd change their methods at some point right?

Like how many things does PETA need to change themselves to before you stop eating hamburgers ya know?

How many people can we fit into a street and how many heads need to be caved in before the left gets some higher taxes right?

[–] match@pawb.social 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

If the communist left somehow elected a candidate that sends the Superpolice to billionaire's homes and kidnap them to el salvador, everyone else would probably be like "it's just crazy people wanted that"

[–] UsernameHere@lemy.lol -4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

No, Trump won because of foreign influence primarily from Russia. Also he had help from the billionaire class and the GOP propaganda machine.

Together they were able to tip the scales less than what Trump lost by in 2020.

They accomplished this by convincing democratic voters to either not vote or to vote for Trump.

[–] piefood@feddit.online 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

While those things had an affect, I don't think they were the main reason. The Dems sitting on their ass when they had a chance to fix things, their pandering to the rich, their pro-war stance, and their general disdain for the desires of their voting base were a much bigger reason.

[–] UsernameHere@lemy.lol -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Money makes or breaks elections.

I think Dems would’ve lost by much more if they didn’t work with the rich, the military industry, etc.

For example, the progressives that lost their elections because AIPAC funded their opposition.