this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
1078 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

71932 readers
3508 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Laser@feddit.org 57 points 2 days ago (7 children)

I had a phone without before, that one came with a simple cheap passive adapter for USB-C to 3.5mm headset. You lose out on using headphones while charging, but other than that I was never really inconvenienced...

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

That means the audio still goes through another DAC, lowering the sound quality, compared to an analog 3.5 jack. Also, who wants to further risk wearing out\vreaking their charge port, jack inputs almost seem like they can't break.

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Technically it only goes through 1 dac, not "another one". But still, yeah, your phone's dac is most likely a lot better than the one on a $10 adapter. However, the usb-c spec does allow an analog audio signal passthrough. Whether that's available or not depends on the phone I guess.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Too bad LG got out of the phone biz. They had the best dacs and some good phones.

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 2 points 12 hours ago

Damn right. LG G5 for example was a pretty interesting concept that could've evolved into something cool.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 80 points 2 days ago (2 children)

After having a phone without a 3.5mm port or a microSD card slot, the top 2 features I want on a phone are a 3.5mm port and a microSD card slot.

Shame Sony discontinued their Xperia 5 series, even if they were also excessively priced.

[–] Pirate@feddit.org 0 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

What's the use case for microSD slots on phones these days anyway?

If it's (just) to avoid paying Google or Apple storage fees, you can work around that by buying one or several HDDs to keep at home and sync stuff over the local network, possibly even build a server and access your stuff remotely.

I really don't understand the need for that much space on the go, though. Are you watching entire series on your phone?

[–] warm@kbin.earth 4 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

"just", I think not giving money to Apple or Google anything is a perfectly good reason alone to want expandable storage.

Phone manufacturers charge a massive premium for more storage on a phone, storage which is then lost if the phone dies. A microSD card can be moved around and they cost little.

Not everyone has a home server, in fact a very very small percentage do and being able to store their photos and what-not on a microSD card is very valuable. The freedom to add more storage is a good thing to have. Most people can understand an SD card, but not how to setup an entire home server with syncing etc, let alone exposing that to the web to access it anywhere. It also costs money to run, a microSD card doesn't.

The only reason we don't have expandable storage or a 3.5mm port anymore is: money. They want to sell you that cloud service, upcharge you for more internal storage and make you buy their bluetooth earbuds.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I hope you’re not suggesting that people store all of their photos and movies and stuff on their phones SD card and SD card only……

SD cards are absurdly volatile and prone to corruption.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 1 points 2 hours ago

Of course not... people should still do regular backups.

[–] Pirate@feddit.org 0 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I understand all of that and I agree with you. Not wanting to pay monthly storage fees is perfectly reasonable too. I know I did everything to avoid giving Google any money for storage.

But microSD slots on phones aren't coming back, and manufacturers are giving you 512GB of internal storage at most, so we need to move on with the times.

I don't have a home server (yet) either, but I do have 2 TB disks I use to store all the important stuff I want to save forever. Nothing lives on my phone so I'm fine with 128GB.

Local syncing can be done just by installing Syncthing or Omnisend, and everything gets transferred through your home Wi-Fi. No need for complicated setups. I mentioned home servers as an example but you certainly don't need one.

MicroSD cards also die so I don't know why you used that as a slight against internal phone storage. You should always have backups.

Storage is dirt cheap these days, it makes no sense to hinder yourself buying niche phones, often at inflated prices, just for a feature that is easily worked around. In my opinion.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

aw man, this is the first i'm hearing about discontinuation. apparently it's because people want larger phones?!

i have a 5 IV and it is by far the largest phone i've ever owned... i wish it was like an inch smaller. but it was the only model i could find that doesn't have a non-rectangular screen. these bloody camera cutouts are everywhere and i never even use the front camera.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 11 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Yep... everyone wants phablets. Apparently.

I don't mind the cutouts (if done right), they just sit in the notification bar, so they never obscure anything anyway. That's a place Sony could have shaved off the extra height imo, the top and bottom bezels are pretty unnecessary.

We are slowly moving to under-screen cameras now though.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Mandrilleren@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The Sony form factor is the best on the market IMO. You can hold it in you hand and get more screen in the height.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 3 hours ago

They’re really no different to a regular iPhone or iPhone pro in terms of size.

https://www.phonearena.com/phones/size/Apple-iPhone-16-Pro,Sony-Xperia-5-V/phones/12239,12193

[–] lime@feddit.nu 4 points 1 day ago

agree, i just wish they kept a model like the Z* Compact around.

[–] stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I disagree about this being a good solution. USB-C is not meant to take the strain of being used as an audio port when being used in the go so there is risk of damaging the port while a headphone jack is more stable and allows the plug to rotate. Plus I don't want to have a dingle I can forget when in a rush.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 12 hours ago

Interesting, I would think that they would consider being eternally connected to a power bank when designing USB-C.

[–] PrinzKasper@feddit.org 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Plus I don't want to have a dingle I can forget when in a rush.

Just have the dongle permanently attached to your earbuds like it's a part of the cable.

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Awesome solution. Remove the port that everything used to have and make consumers buy adapters. I have like 5 headphones. Should I go buy an adapter for each one? Not to mention that I can easily fix a headphone cable but if a 3.5 to usb-c adapter breaks, it basically becomes junk.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I use them and that's more than reason enough to want a reliable, small, cheap, jack that literally has no downsides and lets me use my devices how I want to use them.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 3 hours ago

Unless you want to use them with a device that doesn’t have a headphone jack.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They should make cases with the adapter built in, the way they used to (still do?) for external battery packs.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 3 points 12 hours ago

Or just put the port in the phone.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 25 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You also have to remember to have that adapter with you

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 21 hours ago

If you need to plug the headphones into the adapter, you can just leave them plugged in after disconnecting from the phone

This way, the headphones almost become ones with USB-C connectors than auxiliary barrels.

[–] Laser@feddit.org 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

An issue shared with the headphones themselves

[–] Fermion@feddit.nl 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I just leave the adapter plugged into the headphones. Then there's nothing extra to manage.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I have like a dozen pairs of headphones

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 0 points 12 hours ago

how many do you use per week?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

I have a tablet that came with a C to 3.5 adapter and it worked well enough for a bit but soon enough it was only intermittently allowing the headphone connection to work, with a message about the port being dirty or something. Yet I could go right from unplugging that and putting the charger in and it worked fine.

There's just no substitute for a dedicated port, especially when it barely takes up any room

[–] HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You can find adapters that can charge while still having a 3.5mm back

[–] Badabinski@kbin.earth 9 points 1 day ago

I use one of those daily and god they're all terrible. They're huge and they all break really easily. My phone is fucking huge, just give me a built in headphone jack!

[–] hcbxzz@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

fast charging / USB-PD may not work, and 3.5mm media controls may not pass through properly

[–] Panties@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago (11 children)

It's really a small inconvenience, but using an adapter would mean I'd be prone to misplace it when I use my headphones on anything else, so it hardly makes anything better

load more comments (11 replies)