this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2025
571 points (96.6% liked)

People Twitter

7465 readers
1812 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 23 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (5 children)

Technically it can already talk using its own language.

To talk with human words requires a bump in intelligence which would end up in severe depression once it realises the dynamics of ifs existence.

As you didn’t wish for that intelligence you’re now stuck with a dog that barks with human vocal cords. Its first wish was made using body language for the genie to pet them. The second wish was to trow a stick.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 15 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] sundray@lemmus.org 3 points 15 hours ago (2 children)
[–] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

They know. They just don't want to admit it because of investors.

[–] capuccino@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Lmao. I remember when they got mad because an atari beat up chat-gpt in chess. "Chat-GPT is not a playing-chess thing"

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 18 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

To talk with human words requires a bump in intelligence which would end up in severe depression once it realises the dynamics of ifs existence.

A bump up in intelligence that allows for speech, doesn't mean it inherently becomes aware of all the existential dread in the universe or becomes unhappy with its station.

See: children.

all the existential dread in the universe

See: children.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 4 points 15 hours ago

Man I had existential dread at like 3 or 4 when I started wondering what happens after death and what the meaning of this existence is if it's limited to one lifetime... I'm not even bullshitting.

[–] hakase@lemmy.zip 5 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Technically non-human animal communication isn't language.

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago

Here's the real genie answer, complete with ironic consequences based on a literal interpretation.

[–] LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

Language = pain